Quote ="Tarquin Fuego"read the full article www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/rugby-league/22060533 '" Wont bother, i've HEARD all i need to HEAR. Quote ="Tarquin Fuego"and I am vindicated '" No your not. You of all people, i'd of thought, would have checked your facts before calling someone an "IDIOT" so as not to make yourself look like one. As i said, i suggest you stick to the Sin Bin where the cuddle crew believe everything you say without question.

Quote ="Tarquin Fuego"read the full article www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/rugby-league/22060533 '" Wont bother, i've HEARD all i need to HEAR. Quote ="Tarquin Fuego"and I am vindicated '" No your not. You of all people, i'd of thought, would have checked your facts before calling someone an "IDIOT" so as not to make yourself look like one. As i said, i suggest you stick to the Sin Bin where the cuddle crew believe everything you say without question.

So the initial argument stands then. Hudgell didn't tell Humberside what your quote implies. The BBC have just sensationalised what Neil actually said in his interview and changed a few words.

I don't listen to Humberside as I live in Melbourne . I don't take much notice of Hull Mail as poor read. I read the BBC and I can't see how they quoted him out of context either. So I am right and if he didn't say those words then you are right.

Trust me you are wrong.

Why not listen to the interview on Humberside instead of acting like an idiot

Not taking sides on this, as I simply cannot be bothered to either read nor listen to the related articles but..........

Why would Wigan pay assistant coaches more than the head coach? That doesn't seem reasonable.

Back on topic, if it is Allam, be careful of what you wish for

Perhaps you shouldn't come on here being the BIG I AM and trying to get cuddle crew points, stick to the Sin Bin as i said, you would have had back up on there no matter how wrong you where. Calling someone an IDIOT in bold type only leaves yourself wide open when you are comprehensively proven to be talking $##t.

They don't, nobody said they do...
To save you going through it all...
What was said...
"They have a fantastic infrastructure, they probably have more support staff and backroom staff than they have players. They have conditioners, sports scientists, that earn more than THE head coach and have 4 or 5 internationals as assistant coaches..."

Note... "THE" head coach, not "OUR" head coach.

Listen to the actual interview the link has been posted. You'd have to open ONE link and scroll to the specified time in the interview the time in the interview which has also been provided for you.

Couldn't get much easier really.

There is a scenario in which the Allams would make sense, maybe on a couple of levels. However, that NH and RC are apparently repaying their loan sounds like it wouldn't be them and is maybe clearing the decks for others.

The search that began pre-Larvin has just been intensified and given a finite timescale is what seems most likely to me.

I heard the interview on Sunday, at no point did NH compare Wigan's conditioner's salaries to Hull KR's Head Coach. Tarquin is a liar (again) and all his attempts to backpeddle won't fool me.

Liar, liar, pants on fire.

Good god Stan. You are harsh!!

LOSBL

So in short, BBC RL have ballsed up the written summary of the interview.

=#FF0000I've had enough of your clear trolling.
Go and find another bridge to hide under or take a break your choice.-AS

One of the kids will have to help me out here, what does "LOSBL" mean?

You had pointed out to you quite politely on several occasions.

Note the wording of my original post.

If the comment made by NH was not referring to Sandercocks, then he must have been referring to Shaun Wane. So the question remains, why would Wigan pay the head coach less than an assistant or a conditioner?

Another "classy" response, but wrong again!

My polite response, in kind, just to try to correct your obvious misinformation, no abuse.

Then in true Sin Bin fashion, the abusive response...

abusive response backed up with more bull

Keep backtracking all you want, but look behind you, wouldn't want you to fall in that hole that keeps getting deeper.

I have,

Note: you said "assistant coaches" in your original post...the one this response referred to...

Note: He didn't say " assistant coaches that earn more than the head coach"

You did say "assistant coaches" not "assistant or a conditioner", it depends who/what the assistant assists, and i really have no idea how much salary a "sports scientist" can command.

Heard what I thought was a cracking idea from the lad who runs brid -football team on the radio last night in regard of raising funds to help out at rovers. If the supporters trust can get 5000 to pledge a fiver a month through the bank this would raise 300000.add this to what Hudgell Crossland already invest and would this be enough capital to reignite their interest in staying and running the club.

Good idea but to get 5000 is maybe asking a lot but some one should give it a try

The trouble with reading this forum is you have read loads of pages without much info! Two points I would raise are...

Hull FC fans need to be careful what they wish for Derby's are great for fans and it is better that KR are in SL. Even though Hull FC are in a better place money wise are they delivering to their aspirations?

I think Hudgell rant wasn't the best idea. We need loads on money pumping in and we can't compete with the big boys? Better to just say we as stepping away to focus on other business ventures as it doesn't give future investors any confidence. Worse sale pitch in the history of rugby.

Two pages about if the word Our or THE was used? If he was comparing that to Shaun Wane HE will be on more than Craig S and if he was refering to CS it's as the previous poster said. Either way the basic of what he said was Wigan have an extensive backroom staff on good wages. The details isn't worth arguing over the finer points.

It was hardly a rant and it certainly wasn't a sales pitch.

It is what it is and it is on plain view, there's no point in selling it as it as something it isn't because...

1. It isn't likely to work and
2. Even if it did, we've sold to a soon to be disappointed dimwit

We're a middling SL club who will draw in something like 7-9k fans depending on the economic climate and on field success. We lose some hundreds of thousands of pounds just to get by at the level we are, but by the standards of SL as a whole that is actually... well, if not 'modest' also definitely not unusual. There's a foundation there for somebody to build some real sporting success, if they have the cash and the desire.
And I imagine it'd be a clean-ish slate with no especial mess to clean up - when did that opportunity last arise?

I'm normally great with these but nope it's got me I reckon it's along the lines of l... O.... S.... B.... L....

Brings back memories of the stupid acronyms I used to put on the backs of my love letters to my girlfriend (now wife) when away with the navy (S.W.A.L.K etc).