They stated that the TV didn't show it as it was and that the collision caused it.
Like I said right at the start believe what you want.

BTW Go back and read the thread again on what my view was about what caused it.
You will then see that I was in fact of the view that the heel caused it.
So when you said I was wrong for just stating what others were saying you were in fact speaking out of turn unless you were saying that I hadn't spoken to said individuals in which case I am happy to swear on my children, my wife, my family and my home that I did.

Remind me where David Hodgson and the staff that carried him off the pitch were in relation to the incident.

The TV didn't show it as it was? The camera never lies.

All I ever did was state what they had said.
I did also say that you can believe what ever you want as well.

You did however wrongly state that I was wrong when that wasn't my opinion is was commenting on.

You made a statement followed by "if folks chose not to believe that...", this is insinuating that you're sold on their story and have changed your mind.

Stop being an idiot.

Everyone can see the contact in the tackle is in the wrong place to cause such damage. Taking into account that the heel then is seen to practically stamp the part of Lincoln's head where the laceration is, I'd say that's case closed.

Hodgson, 40 yards away? Staff that carried him off, 50-70yards away? Camera, in on the action.

Then you would be incorrect AGAIN.
It isn't my fault that you wrongly assumed what I meant.
Clearly I'm not going to get an apology for your wrong assumption though.

So what do you think caused the laceration?

His heel as I stated right at the start.

All I did was say what they had said.

Oh, in future you should follow up with "but I think they're talking anus".

Then it wouldn't make you look like a massive vagina doing a u-Turn.

Or you could ask me outright what I meant instead of jumping to conclusions.

I don't believe it. Only if RLFANS Correspondent confirms this opinion, will I believe it.

For the record it's clearly a laceration wound caused by a jagged/bladed egde.

Postscript
Excellent use of animated GIFs Dum.

Ouch, I hope he was in cuckoo land before that heal made contact!

Jesus man what is wrong with you! get a grip it is only a friggin forum not a court of law

As tough as rugby is, you don't see that many sickening injuries. This was probably the worst seen at Rovers since Chev Walker's leg.
Nasty stuff indeed.

I just don't like being accused of saying things I didn't say.

You need to chill out and let it go over your head instead of being a girl. I doubt people believe much of what I post, and tbf they are probably right to believe that, as I often talk shiite! who cares, honestly no-one cares.

How very patronizing.
Cheers.

I never tell lies.

Seriously guys, you're arguing over nowt, been spending too much time west of The Chocolate Rivers' Tributary?

See your at it again, I don't care enough to be patronising to you! nor do I imagine the majority of others do.

You need to come off your high horse, thing is this is just a faceless place where posts are made so in essence every-one is equal, and this may come as a shock but that little moderators badge don't make you any different to the rest of us no matter how much you think it does. You did a massive U turn and got shown up, but swearing on your families life's is just too extreme considering no one really gives a rats anus.

Thing is Dudley I can't argue with your edit



Nowt wrong with playing the sexist card [size=50when it suits me[/size

All in jest Bet, you talk more sense than alot of the men on here.[size=50I can't believe I just said that!!!
[/size

Allamesque-like bizarreness!

Ah that's a nice thing to say, tbh there are a few decent posters on this board who certainly know their rugby. Sandra knows her rugby very well, I like her posts about the game, oh & Edith she knows her stuff...Girl Power

Erm......No I didn't.

I knew the other one would be around shortly.