I get your point but it's slightly pedantic. Yes they can but generally they don't. There is an away area at the KC that's for certain and for obvious reasons most away fans will go there. Ditto CP. This can be achieved because it is possible to segregate through the turnstiles and from within. This is especially the case at CP where the stands are separate.

This is not the case at BV where the whole terrace 75% of the ground is accessible from the inside with only the small seated area able to be restricted. Yep it's a really old and poor stadium for the modern game.

Last year we had real issues between fans with trouble caused by both. We simply have to do something this year so lets see how it goes. It's probably a back handed compliment as this plan only applies to clubs with a large away following.

Unfortunately its partly because when Cas came there was a bit of trouble. I can't understand why putting a roof on the terrace makes a difference but for some reason it means that the idiots want to throw things at each other.
Wasn't a problem with others but as the club want to get teh home fans in there to make an atmosphere they want to make it safe as well and need to be seen to be doing something from a RFL point of view. (All my opinion by the way. no one has actually said that is why)

I've always had good banter with away fans when standing up there. Hull KR are the same, but equally it will make the atmosphere better for both teams to have their supporters together.
There is a covered area on the west terrace too if it rains, and you have plenty of bar access down there too.

Hope you enjoy the game whereever you stand.....but not as much as us obviously

Personally I prefer to be down the side, I just need to remember whether I'm going or not now.

Dale Ferguson on loan for a month and available for the game on Saturday.

You'll be ok on the Western terrace, as long as it doesn't chuck it down, although there is some cover at the "flats" end of the Western Terrace.
Also, touchline bar, bottle bar, snack bar and toilets are all down that side.
We normally enjoy some good banter with the KR fans on that side and hopefully you'll have an enjoyable day (apart fropm the result)
If you bring 3000 accross, I dont know where they will put you.

Like some other Trinity supporters I've always used the West Stand and will still probably do so on Saturday. Banter and a good natter with away supporters is all part of the "matchday experience" and long may it continue. As others have said this move is more about trying to ensure a peaceful game (well at least off the pitch!).

19 man squad:

Liam Salter
Omari Caro
Dale Ferguson
Graeme Horne
Adam Walker
Cory Paterson
Con Mika
Evarn Tuimavave
Jordan Cox
George Griffin
Josh Hodgson
Mickey Paea
Keal Carlile
Craig Hall
Michael Dobson
David Hodgson
Greg Eden
Sam Latus
Lincoln Withers

IF Eden isn't fit and from what was said at the fans forum he wont be, same squad but Ferguson in for Lovegrove?

D Hogson / Caro / Salter / Horne / Hall / Withers / Dobson / Tuimavave / J Hodgson / Walker / Paterson / Mika / Griffin
Bench - Paea / Carlile / Ferguson / Cox

Eden
Caro
Salter
Horne
Hodgy
Hall
Dobbo
Tuimavave
withers
Walker
Mika
Paterson
Hodgson

REP:
Paea
Griffin
Ferguson
Carlile

Wonder why Eden is being included if he is all but officially ruled out.
Another late fitness test?

At the risk of becoming a broken record, stop putting Graham bleeding Horne in the centre!
If Eden is out and we must tinker with the lineup I would go with this:

Latus

Hodgson
Hall
Salter
Caro

Withers
Dobson

Paea
Hodgson
Walker

Mika
Paterson
Griffin

Tuimavave
Cox
Ferguson
Carlile

I'm with Mr. Zod and his hokey cokey selection policy with regards Withers, so despite who is or isn't in the nineteen, I'll go with.

Hodgson D., Brown, Heil, Salter, Caro, Hall, Dobson, Tuimavave, Hodgson J., Walker, Mika, Paterson, Griffin. Subs: Paea, Withers, Cox, Ferguson.

Bemused as to why everyone has Mika down as an automatic selection. Not a consistent SL standard player for me. Causes the team more problems then he brings advantages ..

I think that's a bit harsh, but at the moment who would you play in front of him?

He's got talent, I think his main problem is a lack of stamina and a tendency to over play things on occasion.

[q over play things on occasion.'"

i think it will be a very tough game tomorrow, especially with Trinity smarting from a pasting last time out,we were also under par last week but i believe if we start well and get stuck in and complete our sets ,Rovers by 8!

I don't think its that harsh as he has now had a full season and 2 pre seasons under his belt. Well paid RL players should be showing somewhere towards their full abilities after that

The bloke has some great talent with the ball no doubt, in keeping with a lot of our players, however at least half of the game is about defending and for me Mika is a weak link in that department in the forwards. He looks to have that Kiwi trait of either mentally switching off when things don't go to plan or perhaps is just a little lazy/unfit (despite looking a fair bit lighter this year).

Jury still firmly out for me and he really does have to justify another contract.

Pretty much agree with all of that, he can put in a big clean hit in one set and in the next just trail an arm at someone as they burst past.

I don't think he's necessarily unfit, but I do think he lacks stamina. Sandercock certainly didn't spell him properly on Sunday, he was blowing for about ten minutes before he dropped that ball. I think Sandercock needs to accept that he's not an eighty minute player and use him accordingly.

Totally agree about him being a fair way off a new contract.

Craig should spell Mika with Paea both can be destructive with ball in hand but having both on the field when defending we look vulnerable!

I think Mika is starting to get a reputation that is totally unwarranted IMO (as far as this year goes anyway).

He was excellent in the friendlies against Wigan where he put in some murderous tackles and was really solid defensively and against Hull where he put in more big shots, was solid defensively and gave us very good go forward.

Last week he was our second highest tackler behind Josh Hodgson and I don't recall him missing a tackle. It's fair to say he appeared slow getting back after finishing his tackles last week but I heard he was still suffering from his groin injury which must have affected him.

His knock-on just before he went off was not his fault either. It was Withers' fault because he threw the pass at Mika's shoulder.

If any of you have hullkr.tv take a bit time to watch the first half against Catalans and I think you'll acknowledge that he didn't play badly at all because you see things a bit more for what they are rather than dealing with the tension and emotion of watching it live.

hall was training with dobson today so i think he might be at stand off and latus was catching bombs off dobson so i guess he might be full back as eden wont be risked although he was doing sprints so should be back next week

mika will lose his reputation when he puts in more than a 5 minute spell galea and newton played the full 80 every week

mika reminds me of willie manu[size=50's grandmother, although she can run for more than 5 minutes without keeling over and her tackling technique is better[/size

Not as comfy as the scoreline suggests, we really had to work for that win, especially in the second half. Some absolute brutal hits been put in by both teams. Just one question though: Since when did Michael Dobson beome Australia's Kevin Sinfield (not for his playing, but for constant beefing towards the ref)?