How can you call them shocking deal's without actually knowing the cost of them and why would you only 'possibly' sign Lovegrove?

Jimmy Mac was born and raised till the age of 11 in Banff Scotland.
His father was a pilot who joined the Australian airforce as an instructor and took young Jimmy to Darwin where he learnt League at the Northern Territory Institute of sport.

Nowt wrong with 31 that seems to Be the age to sign an up and coming class rugby player

David Hodgson will be on very good money and he's here for another 2 years. Netherton will be on a decent chunk that we could get better use with a better quality of player and both Liam Salter & Chris Heal for me will both be ahead of Latus by the end of the season.

This is all just an opinion of course.

How can you base an opinion with no actual information?

For all you know, Latus, Hodgson and Netherton might pay HKR to play for them? Jokes aside, all 3 have played more games than Rich Beaumont, George Griffin and Keal Carlile. Their deals, In your opinion, are absolutely fine.

Beaumont if he can stay injury free has potential, Carlile provides adequate cover at hooker and is yet to do anything wrong. Whilst your probably correct to be speculative about Griffin.

I'm Carlile's biggest fan, he should play.

Carlile could/should be on more money than Latus, Latus has played more games yet his contract, in your opinion, is shocking and Keal's isn't?

I don't understand the logic. Why are the ones that you've highlighted as being shocking, shocking?

Edit; Before quoting dictionary entries to me, why don't you look up "being" and start using it properly. Annoying that.

I went through this when i changed my post prior to yours at 17:33.

Is Lyon coming to play in the centres? Can't see him shifting Green, that's all.

OMG. The grammar police.....

Yawn.

BTW when was the last time I actually used been instead of being out of interest?

As a man with 12000+ posts on this Forum, you surely know that edits aren't flagged up as new posts, Ergo - I didn't see your edit until you mentioned it.

I edited it prior to your post getting laid down. At the time I'm guessing you'd already quoted myself and was in the stages of posting a reply after checking my correct use of grammar.

If you didn't see I also edited my post above yours.

Quote ="Easty"OMG. The grammar police..... Yawn. BTW when was the last time I actually used been instead of being out of interest?'" viewtopic.php?f=59&t=524952&p=16835288&tsmp=1334163046#p16835288 Yesterday.

Quote ="Easty"OMG. The grammar police..... Yawn. BTW when was the last time I actually used been instead of being out of interest?'" viewtopic.php?f=59&t=524952&p=16835288&tsmp=1334163046#p16835288 Yesterday.

"Back? Whens he making his debut more importantly

London has being mentioned so two weeks away."

Classic.

Possibly on Thu Mar 15, 2012 1:04 pm




Double ganger.

And their was me thinking I'd actually improved on my grammar.

There.

Good one.

I'll let you off for starting a sentence with "And", It's more socially accepted these days. The other, That you did on purpose wasn't funny.

I like to start sentences with 'pickleweasel'.

FFS All this grammar is doing my head in.


Right whats wrong with this one above I've look been and being on the tinternet and I'm baffled.


This one above I know is obviously wrong.

Well, as you asked me (and Barney obliged) to find when you last used being instead of been, I think the clue is in your original question.

Although - You could have meant to write "London was being mentioned", Then being would be the correct choice.

So as my post is past tense been is the correct word?

It's simple.

[list'been' is the perfect case of the verb 'to be' as in 'He has been rumoured to be back for the London game'. This sentence is in the past tense - it has happened.

'being' is the continuous case of the verb 'to be' as in 'He is being rumoured to be back for the London game'. This sentence is in the present tense and is happening now.[/list:u

As a general rule an 'ing' finish means that the verb is continuous.

'has being' does not make sense.