All fair points.

Holdsworth signs 3 year deal at Salford:

[urlhttp://reds.originalreddevils.com/2010/06/01/reds-secure-prized-holdsworth-signature/[/url

That's that then, who's next

Can I be the 1st to say that we never really wanted him anyway, and that he's vastly over-rated?



Good work by his agent though!

Back to finch I reckon

Excellent work by his agent. Who's your real target then?

cooke

I meant transfer target rather than target for abuse!

Any fed-trained stand-offs ooc this year?

Besides Paul Cooke!



Edit - I did my own reserach and the answer is, basically, 'no'.

Paul Sykes and Danny Orr were the closest to fitting the bill.

Paul Sykes is barely able to call himself a rugby league player never mind a stand off.

The lack of depth in British half backs is alarming to say the very least.

i can't see any of the top halfbacks signing.have rovers got the money to finance a deal for someone like finch?

Depends on who goes. If Walker, Webster, Galea, Mills plus the Cooke savings are the ones not to be renewed, then I suspect we could afford him along with two others, but I doubt he will be here next season.

So we are after a salford halfback, who said it was holdsworth?

According to some muppet on Sportstalk, we are announcing Jeff Lima AND Finch in Monday's HDM.

The HDM man on the panel said 'are we, first I have heard of it'

James Smailes is the Hull FC writer.

The Lima/Finch double signing has been referenced multiple times this week on the HDM comments section, how much more reliable a source do you need?

Hudgell will definitely not announce anything before the end of the season, his position on "early" announcements of signings (made after FC announced O'Meley and Fitzgibbon in mid-season last year, coincidentally) is far too categorical for that:
'Knowledgeable fans are not fooled nor should they be by promises of big names around the corner.This competition should be about here and now and not next season. Anything less is selling those supporters short in my view"

I have said many times, I believe we have signed a player when NH or someone 'official' at Hull KR say ' we are pleased to announce the signing of............'

Until then, I tend to dismiss it.

tend to agree there.but if rovers finances are as bad as rumoured(

)then i can't see them splashing massive money on top aussies etc.

We may very well not bring anymore overseas players - Galea and Webster would both have to make way, for a start.

With a new, big TV deal in the offing for the NRL and the pound-Aus$ exchange rate the way it is, getting good Aussies at a reasonable rate is going to be much tougher. Economics might make the quota irrelevant - and see more of the top British players pursuing their careers down under. Interesting times ahead.

So do you agree or disagree with his statement?

What I think of it is irrelevant. The fact is that if Rovers, having a disappointing season in comparison to last year, were to announce any signings early, it would be absolutely unbelievable hypocrisy.

Since you ask, however, I disagree with his statement. Deals were done already, why not announce them? I also don't feel that I've been sold short by the signings of O'Meley or Fitzgibbon.

If and when it happens you can have your moment in the sun. I might even play semantics with you - there is always room for retrospective interpretation.


If it were a genuinely impressive signing, that would offer some consolation for having such a [iperfidious[/i chairmen.

Until then...

Not 2 men - one man, 2 faces (possibly).

How very astute!