Payback is a bitch (especially when it involves 1 of your own!)

Is a nice and succinct.

Mrs B has the quote-a-dex already whirring

I am really pleased he has re-signed for FC

Shouldnt a moderator be locking this now as Radford has nothing to do with Rovers rather than acting as a catalyst for crap?

He'll be over the moon at a two-year deal I reckon. As I always said, wouldn't have minded him coming to Rovers, but he probably would've played at the expense of Matt Cook who has impressed me recently. Wouldn't surprise me at all if Radders and his entourage were responsible for the Rovers rumours in order to try and screw a (better) deal out of hull.

It was good of Morgan to play along, unless he's in Radfords entourage?

YAY! So glad he has re-signed for Hull FC. What would the KC be without him knocking on, dropping the ball and generally standing there hands on knees panting for breath after being the third man in a tackle?

At least the East Stand has their say in signings then



DON'T SIGN RADFORD.

Hopefully though he's used Rovers interest to bump his deal up, after all he turned down reduced terms so will have hardly backtracked on that.

My opinion won't change, like i posted he is tripe and fortunately he will be still be with you next season

The Phil Bailey thread remained open, so it is just consistency really.

As long as it remains good humoured...

All this and we get to keep him as well. It's like Christmas, birthday and Tom Briscoe's tackle on Fox all in one day.

Does it not worry you then, that your coach tried to sign him?

The best quote in the thread is 'He wants to play for Rovers' despite the fact that he's accepted a lower offer from FC. Oh well.

=#FF0000Edit
This is a thread about Lee Radford.

RBA.

They'll be some red faces on the dullers thread where a lot of fans were saying Radders was past it/ good riddance/ to old/ etc







The East Stand will be pleased....DON'T SIGN RADFORD.

Newton will sleep better tonight ..The rumour he has been hiding in a dark corner or behind

Taking everything into account... he is rubbish so we aren't missing much lol.

Joking aside, he would not have touched our 17 next year. Would have added something to backup mind, as I still feel that we are a bit light in the depth department.

No craig hall too guys

:1efzmssy




simples

Most excellent spin. He's still gash though and he still plays for your team. On the plus side, he did wiggle his Iestyn at me during The Derby after Newton's try, so all good.

He picked you out of everyone in the North Stand? You, and you alone? How do you know this? Avian visual acuity, or just wishful thinking?



I sometimes think Yeaman's stance, hands on hips on the left hand touchline in front of me during a break in play is the equivalent of a Joey Tribbiani "How you doin'?" directed at me, but I'm starting to doubt myself now you're thinking Radford is adopting the same tactic with you. It sounds so silly.

im glad hes staying at Hull, hes not what we need at all. he only lastged 12 minutes against Wire before been subbed, whats that all about???

So glad you are pleased, even more so that you are not at all concerned about that 2nd year, when he will be 33 and shot to !

Reading the umpteen page thread on dulls board about Radford it seems a lot are concerned he has been given a two year deal. Its good if he did a Moa and used Rovers interest to secure a good pay rise aswell....and long may it last.

A bit, but look at Menzies. Plus Radders stats (appearances vs possible appearances) over the last 5 seasons. Not too shabby.



2006 31/32
2007 31/32
2008 29/32
2009 27/28
2010 25/27

Im not to good with figures Mrs B, so perhaps you could help



Does the above table show then without doubt that the older Radford gets the less games he manages