ey you wanna see me smothered in vegatable oil

He goes for that new machine they've got, it does everything........




Snickers, crisps, mars bars, crunchies........................

Me too and I drew the same conclusion.

PS does anyone know what that song is at the end of the coverage? The one with the drum intro....

Rob - I've criticised KC commentary before, not heard your commentary before though and on Hull FC tv for the Jake Webster try it's more enthusiastic than Rob Park! Good stuff ha.

It was forward , end of

All hail Hullfctv

Video replys mean nothing as far as forward passes go, thats why we sensibly don't allow video calls on them.

The angle that is shown on Hull FC's website would suggest a forward pass, momentum however does come in to play and I can imagine that from another angle that it wouldn't look like one.

Either way, it was a very close call. People saying it was a clear cut decision or a "mile forward" are clearly just seeing what they want to see. As are those that say it definetly wasn't.

Finally!

Now go tell Robbo 4



ps Thankyou for admitting it was forward.

Finally a sensible take on it, you're quite right why they don't go to the 4th official, it is solely the call of the ref, he called forward, and he's is the only opinion that matters as far as the game goes, so the record books will just record it as an error, end of, think it's time to lock this one, the well is dry.

sorry Balearic if you pause it when hall passes then again when Raynor collects with his arms at full stretch than it is clearly forward no arguments

Hope you don't mind cheeky charlie but i've used your idea for my sig, to good to miss out on

Thats brill

It looks forward, marginally, from that angle and even then there is the argument of momentum which is clearly talked about in the rule book. However how many times in a game have you seen a video reply of a try from multiple angles where one angle suggests a pass was forward and the others don't (or vice versa)?.. Happens all the time, which is why the ref's and touch judge's opinions are all that matters. I think its most gauling for us FC fans for the fact that you will see Silverwood and his touch judges apparently miss quite a few borderline passes per match.

Its fish and chip paper anyway. It didn't decide the match. If Hull had scored then the game was still far from over, it could have gone either way.

I've admitted nothing, your honour.

Cheers!

Although I admire the artistic quality that has gone into it,it does show you have a lot of time on your hands.Isn`t it time you got out a bit?

Better than spending all day on here or trolling through past threads or even just spending all day working out facts and figures

To be fair to the Gateshull lot its a bit gloomy on their board boycott this boycott that, maybe its a nice break on them on our board to hear positives

Jeez,can`t be Rsed with that,just come on here for the banter.

Not me,I hate cricket.

Is that why you Gateshull fans appear to be stumped !!!



And most of your players are L.B.W ( Legless. Before. Weekend)









credit where credits due though all the other Gateshull lot ( Robbo 4 , FC gimp, Barista, FC till i die , etc etc ) have gone A.W.O.L, but you remain

.......and not to mention Hutchie

















the Gateshull fans media spokesperson who totally fooked up media relations for the Gateshull fans after he got "MEDIA HUNGRY" and peed the board off so they cut all ties with him

I'm with you on that

Watching superleague show today Hudds 1st try looked a bit forward

But so did Hull's first try......oh wait a minute......