Truth is bud you were fortunate not to be out of it at half time.
If Rovers had stuck a couple of further tries on in that 1st half then the 2nd would have been a stroll.

Thanks sir, and with the superior beings also losing to Bradford it's a good week end for you too.

We never really got out of second gear and fluffed a few chances we normally would have taken but its another two points against a team clearly fired up for their big one of the season.

Onwards and upwards.....monday next and halt the impressive away record of Huddersfield....one game at a time.

Despite perfectly good dis-allowed tries, if Ganson had gone to the screen when Hall lost the ball, Dobson WOULD have been awarded a try.

If you've been the best team in Hull for a while, how come the bookies always have us as favourites?

They enjoy giving money away.

Well obviously.

Dunno but if that continues I'm definately having a fiver on us next time. I meant to put a bet on yesterday of a 1-5 point winning margin at odds of 5-1. Gutted

We are, why don't you!

1) Bookies know nothing about RL.

2) Because they enjoy handing money over to me on a regular basis - it's like taking candy off a kid

Maybe they believe (like you) that Hull FC are the better team?
Factually like you - they are wrong

rovers deserved the win but if hull played like they did in the last 20 mins for the whole match we would of won. it's just rovers puts in 100% for the whole 80 mins. well done rovers see you at craven park.

And if we'd played the last 20 minutes like the first 60 we would have won by more

it's just that your goal line defence was top notch, but i think a bit more preasure for longer then something would of had to give and we would of been in.

We spilt more ball than we did during the whole of our previous games this season.

You didn't appear to play well in the first 60 cos you were outclass by a mis-firing Rovers side.

When all's said and done, we are the better side and this will be proved throughout the season.

And if we'd have had the penalty count they had we'd have been out of sight

I think we got a bit drawn into the one man up game FC employed throughout the match in the last 10/15 mins. We should have continued to promote the ball out wide instead of making it easy for them to read what our plays were, they were lining us up in defence pretty easy and we were coming up with errors.

We certainly never played our best rugby yesterday but we never really had to against a poor FC outfit, we need to play better than that if we want to beat Shudds on Monday.

Have to agree, as much as the result pleases me, the performance didnt.

Seem to keep attatcking on the left too, not sure if this was because Webster was carrying a knock, but Craig Hall was looking well out of it and we should of gone at him a few more times when he shifted to the wing.

no idea. but long may it continue. ching ching!!! payed for my stag do beer money.

And do you honestly think that was anywhere near our best?
Stop being silly.

Because they know as much about Rugby League as you and your coach do.
Simple really.

No. This appears to be the current black and white party line but it's laughable.

We've played miles better than we did yesterday and still should've been out of sight by half time.

If Rovers were top of S.L.,and Hull in league 2,Hull would STILL be the best team for me

Only if you bring your binoculars!

Huddersfield are playing very well, and will want to stay 3rd in the table. Will clearly be a much tougher game as I don't expect Huddersfield will play poorly for an hour and then expect to snatch the game with one good 20 minute spell.