You also have Buderus returning next season, he won't be a huge drain on the cap, but equally, he won't play for peanuts.

Bedsy isn't getting much.
Part of his deal is an ongoing coaching job from 2013.
We have some fantastic young hookers but none are firstgrade ready. He has one year to train up his replacement, and then he coaches the hookers.

If you're close to the Knights board then fair enough but I'm guessing a player with the honours and experience Danny has he isn't going to be on a light wage packet!

I'm not close to the Knights board (partly because we are now privately owned and don't really have one), but it's common knowledge that he is on a a smallish playing contract for one year and then goes on to a coaching contract for a few years.
He already owns a house here, and he already has business interests in the town.
It's all about life after football, and one year at the Knights sets him up for that.

Fair enough but still considering the youngest players are on a minimum of $55k he's going to be easily on treble that

Sure - but he won't be on the 400k he was on last time he was at the club, and he'll be getting less than De Gois was on last year.
Apparently we had to pay Leeds some money - not sure how that fits into the salary cap.

I don't get this thread, still.

Have we signed this lad? Excited if we have, disappointed if we haven't.

I thought this may be worth a bump, if only to watch some serious backpeddling (yes, I'm talking to you Mrs B!).

Girls name, averaging 8.7 games per season. Pah, sod him!

Just gone through it, I'm clean, phew!

Why do we need three threads on a player who if true will not be with us nexst season

It was funny to look back (cheers sirstan), but I think it can be locked and referenced in the other threads.

That 'general derision' Hull 50s fan mentioned would be nice to see.