If you're referring to the trouble a couple of years ago we were given the south "stand" then too? In fact, it was the distance from the pitch that triggered it - folk being allowed by the stewards to sit on the grassy expanse in front so they could see.

Or is there another reason? Grudge makes the rules anyway - he could change them if he wanted - I wouldn't have thought him to be in a financial position not to generate the most income possible.

Yet the Warrington fans who filled the South in 2006 didn't cause any trouble if I remember correctly

If thats Rovers tean we should win the game through the bench, looks a very weak and inexperienced bench that. not one of them would get in Hull's 17 at the moment.

First 13 pretty even IMO, in fact looking at it your starting pack looks very good, better than i though, I would be tempted to have Lovegrove on the bench for impact I Anson at 6, Galea in the backrow that would give Rovers a better balence and impact off the bench.

Fnished yer' spat have we?

Maybe inexperienced but players like Watts and Hodgson are in good form and both Wheeldon and Netherton are experienced SL players.

I still say our first 13 is better than yours(obviously), I know what your saying and think it depends on Morgs mindset if he fancies I'Anson or Galea at 6. I think may go with I'Anson.

You've got to be kidding.

[

They are all waiting for the East Stand extension

Or at least those looking for East stand tickets, on the unnoficial forum and around the East Hull pubs are. Glad its starting in the next few days.

the only reason there was trouble at that derby is because hull won and some d1ckheads in your east stand spat their dummy out and wanted a ruck

And the d!ckheads who entered the hallowed turf from the South stand just wanted to play

.......with or without their shoes on. !!!

was you there? if so,i`m amazed how you remeber it..

My predictions

If Rovers win then there will be around 4 trolling threads on the Hull board within 15 mins of the end of the game, if Hull win there will be about 15 threads on this board almost immediatly!, probably rising to 25 before the mods get back from the game, I must admit though they don't have the quality of the Rovers trolls they make in sheer numbers

.

Don't fret

What time does it come on Sky?

12:30

12:30

The quality of Rovers trolls does seem to have dropped off in recent times though.

I've got me Tin Hat on !

We score a disallowed try from a knock on that does not actually leave the fingers and Hull score a try from a reefed ball, two on one, that is given as a knock on.

You know what Rovers missed today? Paul Cooke.

We lost because we could not turn our Field Position and Posession domanance into points, simple as that.

which has to be a big worry surely, considering we were missing Calderwood and Briscoe went off with 20mins to go. Meaning our backline was makeshift.

The ball doesn't have to leave the fingers. It's called a "knock" on. You knock it forward with your fingers and the ball hits the floor, then it's a knock on. How you can try and argue that decision when it was plain as day is very desperate!

Bless em Wells

I didn't know Hull had signed Ryan Bailey until I saw him play today...