Can anyone tell me how we are in a gud financiel position , NH said we need 10,000 to break even when we were in the top flite and we never acheeved it so we must have been losing money .So how come we are now financelly good .

RRTR.

Why so negative all the time Billy Smarts Ballbag. Why not start to focus on all the positive things that are happening. Relegation could kick start this club, it has certainly given us the chance to rebuild. The future is bright, the future is red and white.......

Just staing the facts no need for insults , were all inthis together .RRTR

It's about time this ball bag troll was banned from this Forum. If the administrators won't do this, then don't reply, and let him message himself.

I take it you do not have spell check on your laptop or computer try one because you can not spell

I think he brings some childish humour to the site. He is so obviously a Hull fan its actually quite amusing.

'Good' is a relative term, especially where British RL is concerned. Fan and commercial support hasn't collapsed in the wake of the (from a Rovers pov) traumatic relegation.

The club was losing money in SL, as several, possibly most clubs do. Things may have been [ua bit[/u better with each club getting more Sky dosh more recently, and the cap not increasing. Our losses were underwritten by the BOD, so are not an immediate threat to our survival. Ongoing losses, as always, remain a concern - but less so than in the 'not good' scenario.

HTH.

Finally a sensibul reply . Cheers bezzy mate

Decent advice, for all that I've just ignored it.



You can foe him as well. But tbf, at about 1 post per day, he isn't a massive problem at the moment, IMO.

I think we need to cut this poor little duller some slack. It can't be easy typing with his left hand whilst getting excited with his right.

They're not really breaking the AUP. At the moment, they're intent is unknown & their posts are open to peoples interpretation. It could be a legitimate question about Rovers' finances?

Some of the responses they get however, are definitely against the AUP, but unfortunately ignored by the Mods & setting the precedent that it's ok to name call/abuse on the site:

Re Finances, I believe Rovers made a small profit in 2015, c£15k (thanks to Wembley).

Creditors standing at around £3.7m, most of which as MR said will be directors loans which aren't in any danger of having to be paid back anytime soon (if ever).

Feeling the luv

Modabee Alert!

No chance. Just noticed that kind of thing creeping into the site, it's unnecessary really. And let's face it, if it was an FC fan posting that it'd get dealt with.

I can't really say anything, most of my posts are insults, but then, I'm like that in real life as well...

If you believe that was a genuine question then your a bigger idiot than him

HE IS AN HULL FAN and I'd go further than calling him a ball bag and say he's a prize c**t

It's Fun time!

The only enjoyable thing about circus boy is he's so rubbish at being a troll its funny. His hilarious send up of an illiterate Rovers fan is on a par with Russ Abbot's Scotsman. Maybe he's a send up. But I doubt it.

Anyway posting about Rovers finances, relegation and promotion opportunities etc you'd expect some comeback of an unpleasant nature if your obviously on a wind up.


Time to flush this t#rd.


Is it your alter ego is it DGM?

at the last meeting pearson said he needed 15,000 to break even and was 3.75 million into you and dosent even support you must be a bigger count than you

If Billy is an FC troll, are you the Rovers version? You seem to have similar writing styles you do, you know.

Anyway, it's nearer £2.6m-£2.7m FC the club owe's Pearson in DL's. £3.7m is the figure Rovers owe in Directors Loan's. As MR said earlier, it really doesn't matter (to either club).

All the financial statements are available online, completely free, so feel free to have a look. Hull's 2016 accounts are due by the end of June 2017, so keep us posted with the results.

Do Go Multiply you shouldn't be on here egging this jerker on. burtons is right it could be you

Muller muller grundy the stones

I'm hardly egging them on. Responding with name calling and abuse would be egging them on though, if they are indeed a troll.