Was in London this week and picked up the last 20 minutes of Briam Mac and his reason to move back to the North,

Most people know why but the best bit was his thoughts on who plays entertaining rugby.

He said there are two sections to SL in the past 5 years and states this is one of the reasons to move to Leedsand be part of an entertaining side.

Clubs he talked about are ST, Wire, Leeds, Cas, Hudd, Rovers and Wigan, as the most expansive and entertaing clubs currently in SL.

He wants the likes of Quins, Wakey, Brad, Hull, to get there act together a bit when it comes to entertaining,

I had said for the past 3 years Hull have been the most boring team to watch win or lose, and so do there own supporters. For the money we all pay each week we do need to be entertained and for me Hull just dont do it.

Do you disagree with him?

Could you provide a link of some kind to evidence your post. I ask because I have a lot of respect for BM but that would change in light of those comments.

Essentially, according to your comments, he's leaving quins and joining Leeds because Leeds can entertain and Quins can't; that's BM effectively saying I've failed, I can't get a team to do it so I'll join a team who can.

Have cas been that entertaining?

But on the whole I'd agree with briam mac (whoever he is)

Hmm, so we're also The Entertainers now eh...



Hey Grafton Red, any chance of a little update on my avatar?

Saying what?

'Briam mac says were the entertainers! Along with 6 other sides'

Hull Kingston Rovers RFC
The King of Kings entertaining in SL

But,

Oh it I can't be d.

Was only TIC anyway mate.

Yes, I wouldn't include Rovers and Cas in that Bracket but then i'd agree that Hull et al are, in the main, dull to watch.

I'm not saying Rovers are not entertaining, but i can only derive an opinion from what I have seen, and that is the 2 derbies and the Sky games:

Neither Hull teams were what you'd call "entertaining" in the derbies.

Sky showed the two Saints games (wasn't that an 120 - 10 aggregate or something)

I watched the Rovers v Wakey (Wakey were entertaining)

Think I recall Wigan v Rovers early in the season but don't remember much of the game.

And there was the semi recent encounter with Leeds (Rovers were entertaining for the majority of that match).

In summary, and only based on the exposure i have had, Rovers do not belong in the bracket of: Saints, Leeds, Wire and Hudds in terms of entertaining! those four are out there on their own.

There is no link it was an interview on radio. He is not leaving JUST because if the entertaining bit but it was part of what he said.

I have to say I do hate all things black and white, but that aside I look forward to Hull on the TV so I can watch them lose but when they have won the rugby they have played is very dull, sorry and all that but your own supporters think it too,.

Avast me hearty,
May I suggest the reason Hull "don`t do it" for you is that you are a Rovers supporter?
I presume you don`t watch Hull every week so how can you pass judgement on them?
If someone asked me to pass comment on Rovers style of play over the season I wouldn`t have a clue.
I love the way pundits pass judement on teams that they cannot possibly watch every week.
Ah well,they have to earn their corn somehow.

it must be true if BM says so, hes a coach so there.........................

Ah, sorry.

personally i think were too predictable, we dont have dummy runners to confuse, we send one runner in one his own with no support runner as we dont off load very much, too conservative if you ask me, i dont think Morgs is a risk taker (other than the big 1 on Cookie) with his style of rugby.
BUT my old man goes to watch Hull and says there the worst hes seen in years, one out rugby from start to finish he reckons,

Yes ,but your dad has been,so therefore can pass fair comment.
My argument is with those who judge,but don`t attend.

Was in London this week and picked up the last 20 minutes of Briam Mac and his reason to move back to the North,

Most people know why but the best bit was his thoughts on who posts interesting comments on RLFans.

He said there are two sections to RLFans in the past 5 years and states this is one of the reasons to move to Leedsand be part of an entertaining side.

Posters he talked about are Old_Faithful_IAKW, Digby, Sheldon, barton baird, ComeOnYouUll, as the most interesting and intelligent posters currently on RLFans.

He wants the likes of Roverswall, Roofs, tonylRobin, pugwash pal, to get there act together a bit when it comes to posting.

I had said for the past 3 years pugwash pal has been the most boring poster to read, and so do his fellow Rovers fans. For threads we all read each week we do need to be informed and for me pugwash pal just doesn't do it.

And he never mentioned Cabman?

At least I got a mention

Cabbie is a one off.

That strange on joined a few weeks ago to wind up sad Hull fans.

If did not post not many would and your life would be over along with Sheldon. Who I have to say must do not but read Rovers posts. SAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAD

How are the English lessons coming along?

Can I have a swig of what your on?

Rovers play a better brand of rugby to Hull but it's results that count. You'd take winning every game boring everyone to death rather than winning half of them playing great rugby and losing half because of your rugby