You ask a perfectly sensible and valid question and the wipe can't be bothered to answer! His ego and arrogance shone through.

Iceberg?
What iceberg?!

It shows that he reads your stuff or has been made aware of it.
You are persona non grata ....
NEXT!
I did chuckle ....
Nothing wrong with the question ... but he had answered a similar one.

Will you be asking some more?
I would like to see the reaction.
lol

Hally's hot air ain't no quitter! but part of me think's your egging me on to be snotted lol

Not at all ... just wondering how long he can ignore you.
Make a name up next time.

You got to laugh loved the response to the question.

Hally’s Hot air asked a ligitimate question only for Jabba the Hut to refuse to answer .
A mardy d response every time a questions is asked he finds hard to answer.
My question for the dugout is “ are you going to answer question or continue to dodge the ones that expose your inadequatesy as club CEO

Two points to your answer first the question before was the same so he did answer.
Secondly Why would he answer a question to someone that always personally attack’s what ever he or club Doncaster do. And where does it say he has to answer every question asked anyway

It made me laugh ... best ITD ever.
Although it is fairly obvious he ain't no Carl fan ... he doesn't criticise everything Club Doncaster does ... just the shoite bits as he sees them.
Me ... I like Carl and I speak to him when I see him ... so I would be a complete hypocrite to criticise someone and talk to them all pally like.

You're not going to get a favourable response by insulting someone irrespective of the weight of your argument.
So hha is being a bit unreasonable I fear.

HHA is being a bit unreasonable. If you don't give respect, you can't really expect respect in return.

I knew you would of loved it as your so far up his you can tell what he had for breakfast!

I only attack the performance of our ceo, and the fact were a stagnant championship 1 club, why is questioning things and wanting better for my team being unreasonable?

That's not unreasonable ... but insulting someone and then expecting an answer is.

Some tasty encounters coming up over the next few weeks ,the inevitable cake walk against West Wales followed by Hunslet , Oldham, keighley and Workington.

These games will give us a true reflexion of our league standing and our chances of gaining promotion.

I didn't travel to London due to work commitments but by all accounts the score flatted us.

I fear the next few weeks will expose us as the mid table side we are, only again for Carl to come out and make excuse after excuse.
Hunslet were very unlucky not to beat York, and the man in the beige chinos will visit the Keepmoat with a point to prove ,along with four or five ex Dons.

Gonna be missing for the Hunslet game ... which is a bugger.
Would have liked to have been at that one ...tasty!

There's absolutely nothing wrong in questioning things and wanting better for the team. We all do that.

I don't know your name but imagine another poster had set up a profile with your name and Hot Air afterwards. Would you feel inclined to reply to any questions they may put to you?

“We were just trying to make up things against a team who know that they are strong, and they play this pitch really well. It was narrow and short, so it suited them with the big team that they had."
These are the words of Horne following Sunday's game and all these posts about HHA's question being ignored are pushing the main point into the background which is that the size of the team is being raised again after the London game.Once again showing that CH is ignoring a problem that is there for all to see and the way he fails to take it seriously is an insult to fans.

I also expected a childish response from you so nothing new there

My point exactly

changed it

Don't bow, it will encourage him

Yeah ... wish I had a quid for the number of times the size of the opposition teams was mentioned.
Yet the size of ours isn't .... and we all know why.

Exactly

Put it this way if a side like Keighley etc beat us then they better not mention their size as a factor ... otherwise I predict a riot!

Bradford and York are decent sides .... but the others?

Those sides like Keighley etc will only beat us on size and forward superiority.

So we will see.

Haven are not exactly tiny in the forwards and I think we managed to beat them.

I am mainly referring to away games ... we should beat most of the rest of the pack at home including Keighley.
And Haven was a home game.

It's not just size that matters ... you need some class players as well.

Haven have two of those.

I am also alluding to the very tight games were size can matter.

I think smaller guys eventually get fed up of tackling bigger guys.