You set your stall out to hammer us and got owned big style so deal with it. Bracek is also up before the disciplinary and guess what not a single Widnes player called up.


Pretty much says it all.

[urlhttp://www.nwemail.co.uk/raiders/news/raiders_fume_as_forward_faces_ban_1_582716?referrerPath=raiders[/url

wingeing barsteward

Vikingman you are a co*k mate.If you think no Widnes player should be facing a charge then it just about sums up your knowledge of the game and its rules - Do you work for the RFL ? Bracek may rightly be up on a charge but are you saying Gannon punching Brett Mcdermott 3 times (Striking) does not warrant a charge ?

Have to agree you tried to muller us most of the opening quarter and we didn't rise to it (much) and beat you at your own game.

And you cannot see why ? Go get a rule book and then tell me NONE of your players should be facing a charge. The point isn't about Bracek being on a charge, it is the fact that he is the only one.

depends on whether you like your nuts being grabbed or not pal

I have watched the replay back loads and cannot see the so called nut grab once. However under yours and Vikingmans way of thinking it definatley never happened or Brett would be up on a charge anyway ?

do you honestly think Gannon would stand up and start throwing punches for no reason minutes in to a Final?

come on think about it

Listen mate, you got beat so lets just get that out of the way first. Secondly your players made there intentions known from the kick off by returning the ball to smash us and then proceeded to get bitch slapped into next week. Now stop crying like a baby and go to bed.

Point is that he was sin binned for striking - 3 times ? Bracek is on a striking charge so why isn't Gannon - that is all I am saying.

Snot Him pinch my avatar lad yours is sh[ii[/ite and to small.

Wasn't to long ago you were baying for blood pal and whingeing non stop on here......That is when you weren't hiding and sulking.

t1t for tat mate t1t for tat, or is that gropes for fists

And look who's sulking now



Still like you said it will be all different when we go Craven park, i will be able to pee all over my shoes and have a rat burger.

Bracek wasn't sin binned for his offence. We have laws that ensure you are not punished for the same offence twice unless the punishment was deemed not to be sufficient.

Exactly, Gannon served his punishment by getting binned.

Bracek commited a shocking high tackle and ran in throwing haymakers later in the game.

Sin bin sufficient ?? Absolute rubbish ! Gannon should have been shown a straight red card and Brett correctly shown yellow for retaliation.

Bracek was cited by Hewer in his report and if it was deemed serious enough to take note of, then Hewer should have grown a pair & binned him during the game.

Sulking Vikingman, me ? Not at all. I have never once said Widnes never deserved their win.

Even the most diehard cannot be serious by thinking Gannon should not be on a charge.

But we have never gone bust old lad................Oh yes and they are our toilets and our rat burgers, not the Councils

Red card for a bit of biff? I think you'd be better trying another sport, like curling or something.

I think i might have to drag the sour grapes out for you pal.

Jesus you lot have an answer for everything.

Its all about comparisons. I have seen players sent off loads of times for what Gannon did. At the end of the day, red card, yellow card or no card (as in Braceks case) Gannon should be on a charge. The RFL have been very inconsistent with their citing on this game. The RFL have missed 1 or 2 other players who are lucky not to be on a charge and I am not just reffering to Widnes players.

Well done Terry O'connor www.barrowrlfc.com/barrow_rugby_ ... newsID=510

Well done Terry O'connor www.barrowrlfc.com/barrow_rugby_ ... newsID=510

Erm no mate, that will be you lot forever going on about missing out last time round.