Quote ="Pepe"I think, in the few games Hulmey played in the first team at hooker, he did OK. His ball distribution was good, as was his dummy half scoots. He just needed to be a little bit bigger in order to mix it with the forwards. That would come and, given his lineage, he'll be tough enough.
There is certainly enough about that lad to see that he could have been moulded in to playing several positions, given the time. He looks like a natural RL player to me. Would have counted on the homegrown quota too.
Hey ho, they know best.'"
How many games did he play in the first team at hooker though ? From memory it is certainly in the low single figures.
He isn't / wasn't a hooker. He wasn't good enough in the reserves in that position let alone make the step up to the firsts.
Ultimately that was his problem in having no settled position for most of his time at the club. Was a half at 18's until reserves where there where better options in the halves and he mixed between there and hooker. That didn't work out so he went to FB at the start of the year and seemed to settle into it quite well where his natural backing up came to the fore and he got his chance again in the firsts through injury.
I can see the clubs reasoning behind it and I did call it previously on the TIW board. He is unlucky in that it took him so long to settle into a position and make the break to the firsts and look comfortable. If he made the switch to FB a year or so earlier and he would probably be the settled number 1 FB now and in all likelihood have bagged himself a SL deal. We have scraped around with dross at FB for quite a few years since Grix left and now we have found ourselves with three of our own produced talents looking good in the firsts let alone the signing of Briscoe.
