Quote ="wackerchemic" Pep, not sure where you are coming from, a club from SL will be replaced by a Champ club.'"
Let me explain…
If the Crusaders are wound up on Wednesday and reformed as a new entity, this makes them the weakest bid in SL. The financial area of a licence bid is seen by the RFL as one of the most important aspects of a clubs infrastructure and bid. It was important enough for them to turn Widnes down last time for the same thing. How can the RFL then kick out another viable and financially stable club and leave the Crusaders in, without almost certainly leaving them open to a legal challenge that would be very strong, due to the RFL ignoring their own rules and criteria, from the relegated club?
Forget about any agreement the SL clubs may have signed about not taking court action against the RFL over their decision, that will be null and void if the RFL then break their own operational rules and criteria in order to favour another club. This is why the RFL are desperately trying to get an agreement from the SL chairmen to allow the continuation of the new Crusaders club in SL beyond 2012.
This may mean one of two things:
- Expanding the league to 15 clubs
This would require an agreement from the SL club chairmen to share out the Sky TV monies they receive 15 ways as opposed to 14. Most SL clubs are running up debts and have already dismissed the idea of a 15 club SL. Some of the clubs most at risk may take this option, but I very much doubt it will be enough to sway the vote. I hope I’m wrong though.
- Keeping a 14 club SL
This is where it gets dodgy, because there can only be two courses of action that can be taken. Either they get all the SL clubs to sign another agreement not to take legal action should they demoted, despite there being an inferior club with only 7 – 8 months trading behind them (the New Crusaders) or, if they cannot unanimously agree on this, then the RFL will have no option but to go back on their word and not promote a Championship club. The RFL’s get out clause is that they said that this would only stand should there be a suitable Championship club at the time. In other words the RFL will just play down Widnes’ bid, as they did last time, and refuse us a licence. They’d probably play heavily on our poor league finishes over the last three seasons. This would be a far easier situation to defend in court imo.
There’s not a cat in hells chance of the likes of Wakey Cas and Salford signing any agreement that will give the Crusaders a licence, possibly at their clubs’ expense and lose the threat of legal action should this be the outcome. These clubs are now in a very strong position. The current situation at the Crusaders and the desperation of the RFL to keep them in SL beyond 2012 changes everything.
Quote ="wackerchemic" Agreed there were clauses put in place by the RFL re legal action about their decision but I am sure this was for the SL club relegated not for the club going up.'"
It has to be signed by any club which puts in a licence bid. But, as the RFL would have to change the rules and criteria, in order to keep the Crusaders in, it will probably be null and void and a new agreement needed, which I doubt they would get.
Quote ="wackerchemic" Widnes are the model for the rest of those aspiring to get into SL they have to put us up, if they don't then RL has no future!'"
They don’t have to put us up. The RFL couldn’t give two hoots about the Championship clubs. They are destined to be nothing more than feeder clubs anyway. The RFL have never regarded Widnes as the future of RL. Why do you think we are where we are now?
They regard clubs such as the Crusaders and Harlequins as the future. They’re wrong about that imo, but that counts for all in Red Hall.
Quote ="wackerchemic" It will still come down to us replacing either Cas or Wakey,which imo is wrong as Crusaders and Quinns add nothing to RL due to them being exempt to the laws that govern every other club.'"
That’s just your opinion. It has been demonstrated time and time again, by the RFL, that it is most certainly not their opinion. That is why:
Quote ="wackerchemic"Crusaders will be protected at all costs just as the London club always has been '"
So you see the extent of the problem.