2 things.
1 I said we should get rid of Ben at the time.
2 I dont have the cash to pay full whack for player sponsorship on my own.
I dont care who it is i'm sponsoring as my only concern is that I help my money goes to my club,The only thing that happens if I don't throw my £10 in is that HKR are £10 poorer.
Now if you want to look deeper then that go right ahead although you would be utterly wasting your time.
Oh and BTW I didn't come on here to troll I actually came on here for a discussion (I know that is a completely alien concept to you but hey ho)

2 things
1) If you think Rovers should have binned Cockayne, why not send Rovers a tenner rather contribute specifically to Cockayne's sponsorhip appeal?
2) What points are you trying to make here? The vast majority think Tansey should be binned, regardless of the crap it leaves us in from a cover perspective. It's not like we want him to stay because he's a handy player so sod the fact he's let the fans and the club down, is it?

No interested love have a row with somebody else.

Cockayne's one time was far worse than anything Tansey has ever done so don't come peddling that card.

Whether he could or could not hold his drink is totally irrelevant.

What is relevant is a clueless knobstick making unfounded allegations about a former player, who hung up his boots before many on here were swimming in their dad's sac.

Despite what your ego may tell you, you really are not funny and your attempts to hide your cluelessness behind what you believe to be humour, is basically pathetic.

Really? You've had a pretty good go on this thread. When it's pointed out that the clear majority of FC fans on here believe the club should get rid of Tansey regardless of the weakening impact on our squad, and that the condemnation of Tansey's actions whilst bankrolling Ben Cockayne post-conviction is a tad inconsistent, you mysteriously slope off. Shame.

I said from day 1 that Ben should have gone.
But we are talking about someone repeat offending aren't we?
It seems i'm getting jumped on for daring to have an oppinion on the subject.
My actual point is that if you DONT let Tansey go it may leave you with problems further down the track, now if i'm trolling as some of you seem to think then surely i'd be advocating him staying wouldn't I?

I've answered all those points already though.
Byebye.

Doesnt Rich Agar divide people ?

If he tells Rules to sack Tansey he is wrong and if he tells Rule not to sack him,he is also wrong !!!

Tbh I am not interested in Cockayne or Rovers fans opinions on Tansey. Keeping Tansey might not lead to further problems and could end up being a good move, nobody knows!

I want him to have one more shot but I don't think the club will give him it and I can't argue if they do sack him, Tansey has brought this on himself.

Not so much. If you were as opposed to Cockayne's retention as you claim, you'd hardly have put money directly into his sponsorship appeal, you'd have bought a lottery ticket or sent Rovers a cheque. The reality is that you comfortable coming on here and telling FC what to do in a non-criminal case, when Rovers and you did the opposite in one involving conviction for violent crime.

Really? Hasn't he had enough chances already? For me, being unavailable for the play-off game was a right kick in the teeth for his team mates who'd played through injury last season to get the team there. To continue where he left off shows huge disrespect to them IMO.

I've said numerous times that I back Agar either way but if I had the call then providing the players still believed in him then I would give him a final chance.

Not sure they do tho mate.

What do you think will happen, wolfie? Think we could do with a conclusion as soon as possible.

Got to admire his [url=http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/rugby/2007/03/10/barmy-army-115875-18733115/honesty[/url, his [url=http://www.therfl.co.uk/disciplinary?player=cockayne&club=&from_day=&from_month=&from_year=&to_day=&to_month=&to_year=&league=&charged=&search=searchpersistency[/url, and smile at his [url=http://www.thisishullandeastriding.co.uk/news/Courtroom-twist-delays-Rovers-star-s-sentencing/article-292971-detail/article.htmlnaivety[/url.

An all round nice chap.

Tansey, an amiable fool, hurts only himself with his drink splurges. However, as it has now had a direct impact on his ability to do his job on at least three occasions, he must go. I hope Hull can/will have the moral fibre to get rid.

Were you pleased with your club's backing of good ol' Charlie?

Good old wormy

I think hes history and all will be revealed anyday now,possibly tues-wed,but thats only my thoughts i may be wrong,then a signing to follow.

Steady on, Wolfie. Anyone would think I've hacked your account!

You've said we have being Sammut anyday now for the last month !

He's just waiting for Willie to land at John Lennon International and then they'll share a cab over here

And I stand by it.

I wish i was as confident as you, i`ve not seen or heard nothing to convince me that this is going to happen

[url=http://www.hullfc.com/hullfc/contents/?p=7330Sacked[/url

Now he's officially gone we can discuss it on the newer thread with a less ambiguous title.