He disappeared up his own arris?

Which one is it then?

He got injured doing it.

lol nice one wilf my private messages are even worse I try and tidy it up on here lol

Like Crooks and Miller?

No they've been pushed aside as they are not good enough to move forward with the rest of the squad....keep up!

Im sure you'll be able to put the link up confirming that



Crooks dream team

Miller, if i dig my pass brochure out from last year then i'm sure we are building a team around him

1 season wonder, which SL clubs are interested in him this season?
& the only thing I would build around miller is a sandcastle & wait for the tide to come in & take him back to australia.

Ah so its your opinion.

Id like to know whats going on. Seen as people are wetting themselves making sure Azza plays so everyone can wave him off.

Any truth in Crooks joining paramatta next year?

Yoou don't make sense, what has it got to do with me? I'm just a fan posting made up statements, the same as you.

No idea, but we need some closure on the situation one way or another. Seems highly likely he's gone.

nevermind, replace him with a different Aussie every year eh

Finally......penny's dropped!

We've had the same left centre for 13 seasons, haven't we?

Why couldnt Crooks be a winger?

Top wingers are wingers all their careers, you can't make him into a winger because his natural position is going to a better all round player, are you for real?

He needs to bulk up to play centre.

He needs a lot of improvement on & off the pitch, I guess.......

He needs a clip round the ear

That should be his fathers time to step up, he will learn but like most in life, it could be too late.

What insults and what warning..I've had no warning about insults because I haven't unlike quite a few on here whom are quite keen to spout rancid bile in posters direction which is directly against the AUP and seemingly are untouchable, are you a self appointed Moderator here now?


If you think me (or anyone else) saying what someone else writes is rubbish is an insult and needs warning about then 99% of the posters on RLFANS would have warnings..I don't bleat and whine like a biatch/whinos fan to the mods or send PMs like Easthullfc Fan did to me because he/she didn't like what I wrote..
Grow up ffs, this is an open forum and no insult was aimed, I just made the point that that poster talked unfounded rubbish and having seen no FACTS to the contrary I'll take it all with a pinch of salt and continue to voice my opinion on such whenever I feel I want to.
You beleive whatever you want to beleive, I'm not so easily duped or co-erced into voicing an opinion not of my own unlike a few weak minded types on this forum


EDIt..that was meant to say "I'm NOT so easily duped"

So tell me what I've made up what hasn't happened? or been announced official by the club? I only post facts when my good source passes on information, like any other fan that knows people in & around the club, you muppet.

Actually, what the relevant part of the AUP states is:



Overly aggressive statements of opinion that include rubbishing another poster can and have run afoul of this rule.

EastHULLFC fan sent me a PM, are you going to warn him for his message..I never invited him to send me a PM and I took it as harmful and distressful given its content but felt it wasn't enough to go whining like a baby to you or any other mod.
Have you sifted through some of the insults thrown about on here, if you'd read what I'd said I disagreed in strong but not insulting terms or with any agression what EastHullFC fan wrote..and probably other s too.
Please assert how that breaks the rules?

Are you as a MOD going to enforce warnings and bans at this seemingly new level to all the other posters whom have broken those rules many times before and continue to inflame and abuse other posters?
Or are you as it appears have a two tier system of applying the rules, ad-hoc like..you know, one set of rules for some and another set of rules for another group of individuals?
If so, how is that fair, is that in itself against the AUP for a moderator to be singularly bias in their apllication of the forums own rules?
You may PM me if you like with your answer but I'd prefer you to explain your new set of rules on here so everyone can see and hopefully abide by them...