Nice one, that must be one of your greatest achievements. Seriously who cares? I was just trying to help you out as you seemed unsure by what I meant. So are you going to continue to be vague and add to our nervousness or are or are you going give us more info?

Suppose you could class S.Crooks as admin

OK fella !!

He's a rum lad is Crooksey

Didn't crooks get suspended earlier this season?

Off season I think.

Hehe, cheers bud

.

All part of Rule's plan to force him out. Steve's been treat pretty badly over the last year or so.

everything that seems to happen at the club certain people always blame rule, kh, the board or so on. It never seems the person in questions fault. If rule wanted him out he could have terminated his contract by mutual consent easilly enough

Using your big word (amplified) in the context of your sentence shows you don't really understand what amplified means. You are saying that 'my vocabulary is quite increased/more powerful (or should that be 'exaggerated'

) compared to yours'. Neither really work in the way you meant it.

A better way to construct the sentence in terms of trying to belittle the person you were responding to would have been to say something like 'my vocabulary is exponentially superior compared to yours.
Or you could have just said I understand what you meant by ambiguity, I was just questioning the fact that you thought I was stirring and that it was ambiguous in some way?

So a simple answer to the poster's question would have sufficed instead of making yourself look ineloquent!

HTH

Possibly. But SC has made it easy for him by some of the things he's done.

there is always two sides to a story, his previous issues internally have had two sides for sure.... treat badly?? no but treated correctly for the situation yes

or just told him to close the door on the way out but it didnt happen that way

can i have a PM?

same please

Yeah lets just ditch both and sign who? Keep hall I say, low may, homegrown, give him another chance and a run in a settled position.

Why would Rule need a 'plan' to get rid of an employee?

He could bin him any time he likes.

Can the written form be "ineloquent"?

Of course

it means not fluent in its basic sense, doesn't specifically relate to written text or spoken word.

Am I right in saying that he is an Expro at Hull and Rovers

[From Latin loqux, loquc-, from loqu, to speak;

Inelegant maybe? - variant of ligere, to select;

I have forgotten how / why I started on this now!!!

The poster may be inelegant

but I dont want to pass judment when I haven't seen the dudes face, however the sentence was definately ineloquent in their desperate attempt to belittle another.

Dont let that spoil the rumours.

Changed employment laws these days then have they