So in other words you can't come up with a response.

I guess it's easier to say nonsense then come up with a structured arguement.

I share and understand your concerns but I guess I am more patient to see things out, comparing us to Saints is a no go from the off considering they have played to that structure for 18 months. We wont match them after a couple of months thats for sure.

Energy is not something that is coached and if players can't get themselves up they need moving on IMO. Which is easier said then done.

I feel we are making out that we are worse then we are, we just need some wins on the board get some confidence back into the squad. Still think we are short of winning the league but we should make the play offs.

I'm not comparing us to Saints but why can't we be as good as.Yes they've played that structure for 18 months when a new coach came in and implemented that style. Five years down the line we are no nearer that style of play. They dispensed with Cunningham a legend at their club because they were not achieving the results and playing the right way, sentimentality didn't come into it, so we have no excuses.

Also Woolford at Hudds came in and rejuvenated a club near the bottom of the league and transformed their season so again proving not a player issue but rather a coaching and motivational issue.

A structured argument to you saying , people on here think radford sends the team to go out and play poorly on purpose! Seriously not one person thinks that , you talk nonsense, can't have a debate with a =#FF0000Less of the name calling please. Karen, sorry

Not convinced about Woolford, he took them from terrible to average, I don't think it was any coincidence that they started get players back when they started to win games. Then they lost there last 5 games. I think they might struggle without Brough, Rankin and Hinchcliff they have a lot of cap tied up on their wingers.

Aaaand they’re both out for a while.

Connor suspended?

So the RFL want the season to start with a bang, and they are going to ban one of the better players, despite the fact that the referee on the day only deemed it to be a sin binning offence??!!

Looks like he could be
wont be the first time his mouth gets him into trouble this season

Thing is, they do seen to come down hard on dissent and back chat to to the refs a lot more now

He should have given him a red card at the time then

Cant remember the last time I saw a player red carded for dissent?
With all due respect though, as the talent he has, he is making himself a marked man.

Lets hope sneyd plays or we could have a dream half back combo of Liam Harris and Danny washbrook

#newbeginnings

Selective reading comes to mind.

You can't debate full stop. Mr Hard man.

Sammut got 2 games for something the ref didn't even put on report.

Connor needs to learn to keep his mouth shut to the officials.
If he swore at the Ref , then he deserves a ban imo .

Take your black and white specs off. It has nothing to do with what the RFL want but upholding the relationship between officials and players. Disciplinary punishments are often different to instant on pitch decisions.

Excellent player that Connor is he always has to niggle and try to provoke the opposition as well as continually mouth off at officials. He really should stick to what he is really good at. He should leave the backbiting to players of lesser skills who are desperate to make their mark.

Agreed!

i don't see a problem winding players up, but hes got to learn about talking back to refs, my gripe is others get away with chirping at the ref all the time , Tompkins etc

Think its telling him to F off got him the ban. Agree on the niggling players always in the ear though

Needs to be cut out of the game,

It’s what and how it is said that can get players into trouble.

Can't see the club appealing the ban ,if that's what he said to the ref.

They already have,appeal to be dealt with tomorrow night