So do you play rent free at the KC and were would you play if you didnt have the KC to play at oh yeah that dump you called home and you have the gall to call our ground, and Westerman he is a revelation to FC aint he yeah right..

Yep we play rent free, infact the council pay us 1 million pounds a year to play there (it's why we make a profit) but don't tell anyone, there's a good ranga.

Oh and you're right about Westerman, he's .

Just like Hull City we have to pay for using the stadium. We do have the KC and we will have the option to use it for many more years so we don't have to think about where we would play if we didn't have the KC. Strange how many dobbins forget the history of their own ground!!!!!

I see your school was closed today because of the snow.

Rovers fans have the most selective memories of any in the sport. It's what makes them so amusing.

Plus 'gingerspice' is really, [ireally[/i, dumb. I imagine she has difficulty remembering her own name from one day to the next.

Think people are overestimating Leeds, course they should have a lot less injuries than what they had this year but theyve appointed a coach who spent several years at Harlequins proving he's rubbish, not to mention getting Lowes as his assistant who made a total fool of himself when he was in charge at wire. can't see them improving on this year

wat you on about adult education :s

theres usually some last minute deals go through in S/l, might depend on what shenanagans the Aussies get upto before the new season starts

Wigan
Saints
Warrington
Leeds
Hull FC
Huddersfield Giants
Hull KR
Bradford Bulls
Catalans
Castleford
Salford
Crusaders
Wakefield
Harlequins

Wigan - Added impressively to an already formidable squad.
St Helens - Some decent additions should make them stronger and maybe a little less predictable.
Warrington - Added an extra dimension with Hodgson.
Leeds - Always strong and will be again.
Hull KR - Added what was needed. Extra punch in the pack and a new S/O
Huddersfield - Seem to have lost a bit of squad depth but should still go well.
Bradford - Added much needed depth to their squad and already have some good players.
Hull FC - I dont see any improvement in their squad. They have replaced a winger with a winger of equal standard and have added to their array of loose forwards with another one. Injuries again could ruin their season, the depth of their squad isn't great.

not sure about the rest to be honest, but i think crusaders,quins and cas will struggle while Salford could push for the 8.

Why do all teams get one line apart from us?

Strange isn't it? And hkr have added what is needed while we haven't improved by signing a replacement for a player who played 4 games last season and one of the best English players who's still 20, odd eh?

That's not even including our "array of loose forwards".

Since when was Westerman 'one of the best English players'?

The kid has potential but he is not up there with the best English LF's in SL yet.

Since he keeps being included in the England or the train on squad?

He was selected for the Elite 19 man squad earlier in the year which would suggest the powers that be see him as a player with a big future international wise.

Surprised how many people are trying to belittle this signing.

Im not having a dig at the signing at all, I think he will be a good signing for your club if you can get the best out of him.

I dont read much into the train on squad as it has its fair share of average players in it.

Which ever way some want to see it, he is not up there yet with the best English LF's in the league.

From a personal point of view i wouldnt doubt Westermans quality at all and deffo think he has the potential to become an international. What i would question is why Hull decided to make an impressive declaration of intent regards investment of a huge transfer fee and presumably salary on a position that is arguably your strongest.

To cover 6 or to move fitz?

More probably is to enhance his rugby leave education playing and training next to fitz.

A few reasons I suspect. If we had waited a year until both Fitz retired and Westermans contract finished there is a good chance we would end up in a bidding war with the likes of Leeds and Saints and miss out. We were fortunate to able to pay the transfer fee now to ensure he became ours.

If we then hadnt signed him next year our strongest position of loose forward would become Washy first choice and possibly Whiting second choice - not looking so strong now is it?



The fact that Westerman can spend a year training alongside Fitz could also be a huge benefit longer term as well as his ability to play second row and 6.

In a nutshell I think it is a signing with a longer term outlook by Hull.

Hulls off-season just seems to have got stranger and stranger to me. The majority of fans on here seem to think that Hull are lacking a centre and another half back but Agar instead opts to spend a fortune on a looseforward that is likely to not even play at 13 next season.
This capture then thwarts attempts to strengthen other positions due to Salary Cap restrictions so Hull decide to try to release a big earner (Berrigan) to make funds available to make 2 more captures, presumably a half back and centre.
This is happening 3 months after the season has finished. Considering Agar has had about 3 years to build his own squad he doesnt seem to have used that time wisely to get its balance right.

Nobody really knows the thoughts behind recruitment at the moment do they? I guess once the Berrigan business is sorted one way or the other we may know more. Did Hull try to release him or did Berro want to go back to Oz?

I would say we need an organising half back as cover for Sean Long as top priority but that is just my opinion. I dont think we need another centre or prop but to strengthen both positions would be nice obviously.

I would also guess that a big half back signing is priority for 2012 once all the big contracts expire so signing a player now you are basically telling them they are signing as both cover and only for one year. Kind of limits your options!

I would say that by signing an out and out winger and backrower, Agars thoughts behind recruitment are pretty clear. He wanted a winger and backrower..
If indeed Berrigan has asked for a release, which i doubt, then it makes the situation even stranger because without his request you wouldnt be able to strengthen at half back so you would be stumped.
Why would you be telling a player they are cover? Westermans deal would have paid for a top half back, as will Berrigans wages. A top player would back themselves to displace either of your half backs, especially given their injury records.

I highly doubt either berrigans or westermans wage will be enough for a top half back.

Not that clear cut obviously because didnt LMS and Fielden receive offers from Hull FC?

The reasoning behind the Berrigan situation is still not clear which is what I was insinuating above. I would guess Hull are still scouring the world for a half back but nobody can say for sure can they?

If Hull have only recently told Berro he can leave does that mean they have someone lined up? Seem odd to weaken the squad unless they did.