Indeed you will, but looking at the bigger picture, how long has Berrigan got left? Surely the timing of him retiring would've been perfect for Hodgson's potential break into the first team?

If you're not bothered that a promising 19 year old (your Reserves POTY, no less) has just left to go to your local rivals then fair enough, but it seems a lot of Hull fans aren't happy about this!

The club couldnt offer the lad first team rugby. He then decided to go elsewhere where he will get it. I cannot see why people can blame the club for that.We have better players its as simple as that !!

As for Berro, You could count on one hand the amount of Hookers who would turn down his wages and so we should be able to attract a replacement !!!

Berrigan = nail and head



Forgive me, but I am about to commit suicide.

I would have got rid of Berrigan, he has one year left and has been a dissapointment to say the least. I see a player going through the motions and OK he is being forced to play in odd postitions, but he still ain't performing and a year from now we will be in the market for a new hooker.



Its laughable and it comes with a whole string of odd and worying decisions from within the FC heirachy.

Thought you didnt go so how you see him????

Berrigan has 2 years left, hudge already checked

Would you have gone with Houghton and Hodgson as hookers for next season then?

So you'd get rid of Berrigan and replace him with Hodgson?

BQllCks! Only those on Community care or with a white stick and a Labrador!

Deary me.

Did we offer him a contract? Did he want to stay? Was it the money or the promise of first team action?

Why not try to emote less and think more.

Hudge couldnt afford his bar tab in the Weir !!

baldy baldy baldy

Even I have sky



and I have been away



and I stand by what I say , he is part of the problem at FC and I can not see anyone rushing to crack down on him.

Laughable isnt it........Ian has a axe to grind with the club and is using any excuse to slag em off.

Let me get this straight...

You'd have paid off TWO YEARS of a highly lucrative contract in order to keep a 19 year old who might or might not make the grade?

Really?

NAIL...HEAD AND I HAVE A BLOODY BIG HAMMER

Hi guys, first time poster long time reader.

Anyway the main thing that annoys me about this move and others like wheeldon is that rovers can declare them as home grown and local players on their quota.

This to me is wrong seeing as though they've had nothing to do with their development but will reap the credit and benefits when all this federation/non- federation trained and local trained players etc. come in soon

Berro did state not so long ago on Rule night that he had signed a four year contract, didn't he?

thought it was 3 with 4th an option

Im disappointed to see him go as he must of been doing something right to get Reserve player of the year but on the other hand he's been playing second row, which is a position we have more than enough cover in and we've just promoted a second rower to the first team squad who is two years younger.

Even if he did go back to hooker for next season, he's still going to be 3rd choice at best. At least we've still got Hall, Houghton, the Briscoes, Kent, Lyne etc. I'd off been hugely disappointed if any of these went.

That would be good if you actually had your facts right

I think it was just a simple 4 year deal.

that's what I thought aswell, was definitely the story going round when his signing was announced 2 years ago.

Quote ="wolfie"thought it was 3 with 4th an option'" www.hullfc.com/hullfc/contents/?page_id=328

Quote ="wolfie"thought it was 3 with 4th an option'" www.hullfc.com/hullfc/contents/?page_id=328

Ask Agar.....

Not important enough mark