Why don't you try answering some of the questions seeing as though you bothered to post?
here is mine again for you.
Jimm Bullard, seeing as though he is going nowhere, will play for city, bearing in mind he is the highest paid and arguably the best player they have? He'll play every game surely?

No you didn't. Bullard, he'll play every game then?

Try looking at the previous response. If I asked are you a total pr*ck or just a n*bhead, you'd perhaps feel you'd want to add an answer of your own? Your question falls into a simiar bracket. Your chum said Fulham get another £3million if Jimmy plays one more game, I say that's nonsense. Canyou see how your "question" is lacking a stage or two now?

HE'S BEHIND YOU. Oh, sorry, I thought this was the kids pantomime thread anyway, have a look at my previous reply and you'll hopefully see where you've got it wrong again.

So once again you fail to answer a simple question. Why do you bother?
Its is really simple.
Based on your logic, Bullard, as highly paid ex international, will play for city next season as long as he is fit. True or false? That's about the 4th time I have asked you and you fail to answer, except quoting previous nonsense, from whom I do not know, even though you refer to him as my chum.
Answer the question. I am asking you.

Tell you what, I'll make it easy as you are obviously a little slow, quote your own answer to me, and I will apologise profusely.
True or false, Bullard will play every game, if fit, for City next year, in your opinion.

Well, except I have answered several times, but I'll try again in even more simple terms for you. Your question is a nonsense as it's phrased because it's not an either or and the conditional element isn't the one you seem attached to.

Jimmy will possibly play if fit, possibly not, but neither will depend on an a ficticious additional £3million if he plays one more game which is what was claimed.

The answer, as I keep trying to explain is "neither", the argument is "do Fulham get £3million if Jimmy plays one more game" to which the answer is "no".

There are conditions on Jimmy playing, but they're not static. He's unlikely to play for City again, but not because of the £3million clause claimed.

I really don't know how much clearer I can make the point on what is a totally pointless discussion.

4 mins later

Golly, you can cut and paste. Perhaps later you'll learn to do it and keep the bits in context.

Any proof of your claim that Fulham get £3million if Jimmy plays one more game? Perhaps you may want to reduce the amount of money or number of games?

I am not going to get involved in the main reason for the threat, the rank bad management of a football club, but your comment I have highlighted is an odd one. After Both City and Hull FC moved to the KC as shared tenants I lost count of the number of times some City fans found some comfort in texting / calling RH with ill-informed comments on the lines of the KC was THEIR ground and that Hull FC should not be allowed to use it. That is a small minded comment. Fact of the matter is it takes both teams to use the stadium to make it work.

Comments like these only go to show how threatened many of the new bread of City fans were of not only Hull FC but of RL in general. After all prior to 2008, the vast majority of national sporting coverage concerning the city of Hull was RL related.

I use the term "new bread" as many of the die hard City fans who have stuck with them through thick and thin are actually quite embarrassed by the comments and complete lack of knowledge about Hull City and the sport in general.

I seem to recall you commented on threads of old that you claim to be a City fan for decades rather than just years. Assuming you are of a slightly more mature age than some, why do you feel the need to register on an RL forum, to then log on just on the off chance there is a Hull City related thread? What’s more questionable is your signature. For someone who claims to have little interest in RL it would seem unusual that you choose to follow one team, let alone two. How many games have you been to this season? And just who will "never be mastered"? Leeds appear to have mastered St Helens quite well over the last 3 seasons and Gateshead appear to get mastered on a weekly basis. Or are you referring to Hull City? Of course not, because that would be really small minded to post that on an RL forum, wouldn't it.

For the record, I have no axe to grind with Hull City or the many fans who follow them. Unfortunately there are generally a few who think they have a superiority complex which is not only unfounded but is also never backed up.

So if you are "in the know" please tell us all why your greatest ever signing will never play for your club again despite having 3 years left on a deal not one club looks like taking on?

Just for the record as a Hull FC season ticket holder and someone who maybe will see one City game a season I dont think the majority of FC fans do want to see City in this state. Just like most people dont seem to want "AGAR OUT" T-shirts and have a sit in after the game. Just the LOUD minority again I suspect. Also for the record banging on about Bullards injury problems etc. is just a little pot kettle black from us..

Genuine question. If bullard is fit, is being paid his salary and is the best player at the club then why wouldn't he be played?

At yeast the "new bread" of city fans have been handing over their dough for the last couple of years. Those that remain will have to taste a slice of life in the lower leagues now

You've used your loaf there

just out of interest i see hull city have announced the new upper west sponsor, for next season i believe? and on their website from my reading and understanding they attempt to put accross that the stadium is theirs and this partnership is with them?(as an outsider i think this is what would come accross) now surely fcs site should have the links to the new west upper sponsor aswell? as the kc is a joint venture? therefore not letting hull city take all the acolades?

the link, www.hullcityafc.net/page/NewsDet ... 96,00.html

the link, www.hullcityafc.net/page/NewsDet ... 96,00.html

I've never understood the sponsorship arrangements for the stadium. Have we had a cut from MKM and S&N in recent years for their sponsorship of stands? Similarly the permanant advertising hordings which are up all year round and get exposure on SKY when we play. Does the revenue go to us, city, the SMC or a mix of teh 3? Maybe someone from inside the club can answer?

i am sure they would love to discuss their internal business plan with you , give them a call or use the contact us menu, they always reply to my e mail

Why would I need to when I have you to tell me?

Thought the conditions of your restraining order doesnt allow any contact with any club employee?

from what ive read on this board it appears you are an 'insider'

just a fan with lucky guesses!