Thought whiting or hall had a hand on him when bally carrying arm hit the ground

and the first hall held senior on his back

That is exactly what I thought. Have to wait and see it on the box....

As a Leeds fan I was really impressed with Tansey today.

Looked a different player to the one who played for us although that said we never really gave him an extended run in any one position.

Seems to have a lot more responsibility/involment in your attacking systems.

Think your performance with key players missing and your first,second and third choice goalkickers missing sets it up for a cracker next Saturday as your guys and fans will have taken a lot of confidence out of the way you hit back late in both halfs.

I was pretty happy with the performance today tbh.
Our defence does need some work before next week as we were letting them run at us and dropping off tackles all over the shop but that could be a bit of an Easter hangover with two very intense game taking their toll.
Also when Leeds make a break they invariably finish as they have pace all over the park whereas that is a quality we do struggle for a litte bit.

Attack wise, I think we did pretty well and it just shows that we can score tries if we get it out wide. Tansey came into the attack very well IMO and I thought Washbrook had his best game as a stand-in half back for us.

Moa and Burnett had good games again as did Houghton IMO.

If we get some key personal back for next week, namely one or preferably both halfbacks I think we're in with a good shot.

In terms of being below average, I don't think so. I reckon we're about at our level. Yes, we've lost at Crusaders and Salford where we expected to pick up points but we've beaten Huddersfield and Saints so far. If we were 6th having beaten Salford and Crusaders but having lost to Hudds and Saints I don't think folk would be quite so negative.

the fact remains,this is the most wide open it has been for a long time.warrington got beat today by the dobbins,missing briers,monaghan and carvell(after 7 mins)and wire fans have picked up on this.we were missing long,horne,fitz,tickle,calders,and shortly into the game berro!!.we were bound to suffer.hopefully next week will be different with at least a minimum of 3 back(possibly 4,as long has a small chance)

was a rovers troll that hacked his account dumbo

hey youre too sensible for a Leeds fan

Below average team ?????? below average Coach

We have won nowt with Agar at the Club and NEVER will.

Agar is Paul Cullen FACT

paul cullen!!!-that's going a bit far!!!!!

If you take McGuire, Burrow and Sinfield out of the Leeds side they would struggle.

That said I reckon some players could have played today and Agar chose to rest them ahead of the CC game, that's wrong imo and it could easily backfire.

Disagree Paul, as you used the word 'Could' . I'd rather they were a week fitter, as if they had played today (maybe less than 100% fit) then they would have more chance of being injured. Hopefully Longy was watching the game from the stands and highlighted some areas for the team to exploit for next week.

When a team is MISSING 6/7/13 and than the main hooker get injured How well would any other team play ..Leeds are just getting a lot of their main players back ..they didn't start the season to well plus they are still point behind us in the league ..Leeds did get the rub of the green with they first 12 points

Im still confident we'll be up there somewhere at the end of the year.

Same here Dave, I would expect the top 4 to be Wigan,Saints,Hudds and maybe Leeds with Us,Wire,Bradford,Wakey and Rovers battling for 5 to 9 in the league and finishing in that order.

Putting Wigan and Warrington to one side most teams are taking points of each other. Looks a more even season this year with no victories guaranteed.

I think it's getting to the stage where you can now start to seperate SL into the little 'mini-leagues' for batches of positions. For me, it's; Wigan and Wire for top 2; Hudds, Leeds and Saints for 3-5; us, Bradford, Rovers, Wakey for 6-9; Cas, Catalans and Crusaders 10-12; then the other 2 fighting to avoid bottom.

If we improve the backline for next season and can find a back-up scrum-half from somewhere, I think we could move up to the next band of teams (although I still personally feel another coach may also be needed to do so).

and the same faces will be lining up to run at Hall all saturday and he will flap around all over again !!

I know Brisc scored 4 and Hall had a tough time v Senior/hall

Would anyone consider swapping our wingers/centres sides over?

Lets not forget Leeds where missing Donald, Eastwood and Peacock add to the fact Sinfield was brought off with 12 minutes to play and we scored 3 tries in that time when Leeds had stopped playing knowing the points where in the bag.

The three late tries paper over the cracks just like the late tries at Wigan did.

Lets not forget if the game was on the tele Leeds first 2 tries may not have stood! The game is 80 minutes long and if we are scoring plenty of late tries then that shows the players are playing to the death. I don't think the cracks are too big.

Fair dos. Saw the first 2 tries on sky last night. Senior did get it down before being rolled onto his back and the tackle was not complete for the 2nd one either. No grumbles unfortunately

Ive been pleading all season for Agar to move Yeamo to right centre and Hall to left. I'd give that a go with Yeaman handling Senior.

The very same thing has been discussed on another thread on here.Why Agar wont swap them is anyone's guess.

I agree taking the spine of a side away will affect it but in all fairness we didn't do too bad in attack on Sunday it was our defense that was shambolic (ALA Wigan) The players on the pitch have only themselves to blame for sloppy tackling, because i am damn sure they are not coached to tackle like they did.

Probably cos he's reluctant to change things that may make the side play better.