Agree with that - I didn't give initially as the shysters who caused the problem were still there. There should certainly be an investigation of what was going on but I doubt the RFL have the [icojones[/i

That could well happen. I was going to use Farepack as an example, but the government backed down on that and refused to take on HSBC

As for credit agency, what doeas it say about poorhouse lane?

Sorry, must have hit Ctrl + V at the same time

If those that donated money were to contact the Fraud Squd then they would be duty bound to launch a formal investigation, in fact, if HMRC decide to get really involved then the tax aaffairs of the Bulls (and their directors) could be investigated in great detail, I wouldn't be sleeping to well if I were one of the former directors.

(TOTAL EXEMPTION SMALL)

A report to CPS could come in from the BIS department (former DTI) could lead to criminal investigations

Everything's not a conspiracy.

someone needs to make a complaint to trigger things, and then the whole house of cards would come crashing down, I doubt the RFL would come out of it well either.

Agree with all that.


Problem is I doubt any investigation would get past the "if we hadn't been forced to resign we would have sorted it out" defence. Both the old and 'new' directors have ready-made excuses.

Plus there is a good chance that the £500k went exactly where they said it would - keeping the club afloat for a few more weeks. When your wages bill is £300k/month as reported in the press then £500k doesn't go very far.

£300k, i've seen as high as £5mill a year quoted. Makes you wonder what the off the pitch wages are for, bearing in mind players wages are capped at £137,500 per month

Just one of the questions that need answering. Problem is with the old directors and the new lot spending their time squabbling in public and throwing misinformation at each other I doubt the full truth will ever come out.

Where did I exclude mods from my statement, go on show me.....

I won't hold my breath.

yawn

Just as I thought, you can't back it up, you never can!!

When I address people on the thread and mention FC and KR fans it includes everyone. I don't give any mods special treatment whatsoever. You've always had a thing about mods and always will.

only the inconsistent ones

anyway, Bulls.....

I thought I read somewhere that the money raised by the fans had gone on paying off some of the debt's that certain directors had personal guarantee's on. If so a completely sh*tty thing to do ( although many people did warn against the pledge in the first place).

Haven't seen that anywhere other than one post on the VT that didn't get backed up with any evidence. All the stuff in the press suggests it just got eaten up with running costs - which is pretty much what the old BOD said they needed it for.

Nobody was under any illusions that £500k was enough to save the club. The idea was to buy enough time to find an investor without going into Admin. So much for that plan...

your not wrong

We've covered this, yes he is wrong.

in your unbiased opinion, not shared universally though, clearly.

No it's based on FACT. I am one of the moderators and we talk regularly and we do not give any other moderators special treatment compared to anyone else. It simply does not happen.

so RBA got a warning for his post aimed at IanP then?

anyway, Bradford...................

Anyway, enough.

We don't issue warnings to everyone who makes an unwarranted comment. We don't treat non-mods like that and we wouldn't treat mods like that.



The Bradford fans have been screwed in a big way and the current owners should be brought to account.