Yes I am aware of that but i think we'd both suggest its just a tad a bigger game this time and he is your specialist full back. It's a big call and no doubt he'll get some stick of it doesn't come off

It could be a final and Agar would still make the same call...he is very big on discipline.

There will be no stick on here, we had years of bad discipline so we are 100% behind Agar.

Maybe we should have just dyed his hair, problem sorted.

Nah, he'd do it one handed to show off, only move sideways, knock them on then beat the floor with his fist as a 90 year old granny took one off him

I can't believe how fickle some people are. Three weeks ago, most people agreed that Hall had had enough chances, but hadn't proved consistent enough at this level and that it was the correct decision to release him. A couple of decent/good performances later, and everyone's lining up to say he should stay. He has always been capable of good performances - he just doesn't produce them often enough to warrant a place in the squad of a club looking to win silverware.

Regardless of Hall's deficiencies - and I agree with your point about his lack of consistency - I think some people would just rather have him playing and behaving on and off the field when compared to the current incumbent at full back. Says more about Tansey than Hall really.

I agree wholeheartedly that we should have rid of Tansey if he's proving to be a disruptive influence. I even agree that Hall should keep his place this season if Tansey has behaved in a manner that warrants his exclusion from the side. What I don't agree with is the notion that we should keep Hall if we get rid of Tansey (or even if we don't). He's had enough chances, we have plenty of options at centre (he's not a full back), and I don't think he's the sort of player that will take us to the next level.

Agreed. If Tansey goes it does not mean Hall should stay. Hall is not and never will be a full back.

Hint at it from Danny? Sounds like Tansey is the only one not buying it in.

It's interesting that Danny would say this as we all know how he and Thacks alledgedly used to be. It seems like Thacks going and a word in the ear by Rich or one of the new players has done Ticks the world of good.

You'd think that wouldn't you

Maybe we should have hung on to Shaun Briscoe after all.

Well a member of staff has left the building for the last time today !!

This is no evening for wind-ups. Spill.

It's not a wind-up. 100% true that we are minus one member of staff after today.



All will probably be revealed before the weekend is out.

Could be an interesting couple of weeks

Playing?
Coaching?
Back Office?

you think he'll end up with you ?

Don't you start.

pm'd Mrs !!

Cheers fella.

Is it anyone serious? Not sure why a Hull fan would go on the Hull message board stirring up ambiguity before our biggest game of the season thus far.

Prego !!!

Stirring up ambiguity ???

Ambiguity means vagueness, why would you come on here and make everyone wonder the night before the biggest game of the season about who has left. For all we know it could be Rich Agar or Craig Fitzgibbon.

My guess is it's someone like an admin guy but it seems an odd thing to do by a Hull fan to add to an already nervous as hell set of fans.

I know what ambiguity means thank you. In fact, I'd hazard a guess that my vocabulary is quite amplified compared to yours !!

HTH.