I think the SMC had its feathers ruffled and did a little dickie bird tell them,blah, blah blah. A big fuss over nothing - Airlie was banned and I didn't hear a furore.

You're barred - get over it

Did I? At my age I can't remember what I did 5 minutes ago.

Maybe there should be another thread started for those who were way too quick to post their 'disgust' with our club to offer their apologies. What a joke.

I wonder if this is why the 'bird' who did the announcing last season has been replaced?

So has rob chadwick

You're getting so mixed up now maybe you should have a test for dementia. I have never suggested that the board should be sacked. I think they're doing a great job in most aspects. Even if I didn't I'd hardly bother campaigning for people to sack themselves. Likewise I've never had anything to do with meetings "down the pub" so can't put anything on any agenda. My agar out campaign is well and truly me on my own



You should check back on some of kingston convict's posts as I think it's him you need to be directing your comments at

Don't go holding your breath.

Unbelievable how many people are willing to wade into [iour own club[/i with both feet without knowing the facts. Get a grip FFS.

Long said in the HDM:
"I had a meeting with Rich yesterday about how Saints play, the moves they call and I'm helping Rich the best I can to make sure we come out on top."

Meetings to analyse the opposition, whatever next?

I'm staying out of this . Mascots not my strong point !

I can imagine it now:

Longy: Rich, do you want me to tell you all about saints' game plan, their calls, who to watch out for, their tactics and their moves?

agar: Tactics? Yeah please, had garlic last night and my breath stinks

I find it bloody incredulous we get all this fuss over a flaming red and white, flightless, plug ugly, east of the city sort or bird thingy



Omelet anyone

What everybody getting upset for ..It.s effing ugly anyway and it want

ing Now Airlie (god love him )

..If you show your

you get a ban

Yet don't you think that by agreeing to support the testimonial this may have been time to put the animosity to bed.

Healthy rivalry and dislike for each other is good for the game in this city. Lets face it it'd be a bit dull if we all got on but the pettiness that goes on sometimes is nothing short of emabarrassing (and that goes both ways so I'm no way saying that we are taking the moral high ground). Mascots are good for the games, the young kids love them. It was a good sight when Rufus and the girlie bird came out together on the hovercraft at CP a year or so ago and gives off the right image of the game.

If as has been quoted he was banned for shaking the rear of a stuffed bird suit at the north corner of the east stand then it is a bit of an over reaction. (lets face it does anyone believe he bared his ar5e!!!)

If it was any more I'm pretty certain there would have been at least 4,000 pages of shock posted on here.

I hope that if it was the SMC that have imposed this ban then it is a sign of things to come and by July the top of the north end of the east stand will be empty when we visit next. The morons that spend all game time flicking the V's, doing the W**ker signs (especially the n0b doing the throat cutting signs every ten mins) and generally threatening whoever the opposition fans are will also have been given bans from the KC.

One of your players gave us fans the one finger salute at Cardiff, your directors seem incapable to give an interview without the digs at us, your club right from the top appear to be obsessed with us. Now if the bird has acted innapropiatley then he will face the consquences, like I have already said the problem is your club are unprofessional, they need to focus on their own club, stop with the bitter comments directed towards Hull FC!! you do not hear directors of other clubs making unprofessional comments like that..Pathetic

Morning...

Honestly tho', do you think this helps the situation. I thought it was a good move by rovers to play the game in honour of RH and that it might be an end to a lot of the bitterness, and pettiness, that has gone on in the past few years, some of the stuff quoted on here and also some of the things you missed in reverse.

This just leaves a bad taste to what should have been a day remembered for all the right reasons.

Liking your "up and at 'em" approach for 1st thing on a Monday. Good post.



The best bit about all this is the knee-jerk assumptions by fans on both sides that Rule's set out with an agenda here. When the facts are it's the SMC that's done the banning, and Rufus isn't banned anyway, just the man in the suit.

I understand what you are saying, however we do not know the full facts as yet as to what or may not have happened..
However I show an interest in your club/team as I do all the others, I hope you sort your finacial issues out etc..But it leaves a bitter taste in my mouth when I read one of your directors interviews and he hopes you win at wembley so you can carry on the song Ole Faithfull you'll .... WTF do you not think these people should be worrying about more pressing matters than us..pathetic..Rant over

SMC have done the banning, not FC. And Rufus the mascot is not banned from the KC. Why is this bitter and petty on FC's part?

It's my birthday today, noticed a few laugh lines developing this moring so some-one was going to get it

Happy Birthday !!



Ban the bird, Ban Hudge, Ban the smelly lot of them !!!!

I'm not having a go at Rule, I would doubt (and hope) it wasn't a Rule initiated thing. But the SMC is by association part of your clubs infrastructure and I would expect a decision like this to have involved both the club and the SMC (if it didn't i would expect the PR guy at FC to be a bit annoyed) and as such I think the whole thing could have been avoided.

that is a very valid point

Besides dont upset the bloody coffee server, shes the only one who brought Rule into the thread, i think shes got a thing for blowing toffs