If we can book a quarter final berth and go into the Saints game with a more confident home game attitude we could turn the season on its @rse.

Naughty.

Titillation is the way forward.

It won't catch on. Let's be negative about every aspect of Lee Radford, just to keep it fresh and constructive.



[uHypothetically[/u beating Castleford would put us 6 from 7, in the QF, with a home game against Saints missing Walsh. Dare to dream for a day or two.

Change the record,do you even enjoy being a supporter?

Sorry Kirk

So by your reckoning Yeaman is the form player and deserves his place and this isn't a forum to put forward open discussion about the team and why X player should/should not be included in the team?
just so we are clear as to what posters are allowed to talk about in your fantasy forum.
Yeaman is bang average and doesn't deserve to be in the 17 never mind as a starter, that everyone bar one or two including Radford can see that is infuriating. Hence why fans post on forums to vent their frustrations, I guess you've never done that then??

Dog-gone-it, you got me coffee woman.
I'm having a bit of that hypothetical dream, until Saturday, anyways.

I've carefully studied the original post, and I can't for the life of me see any reference to Yeaman being the form player.
I must get a new set of specs. Maybe the sort bumpy wears.
Second thoughts, I think I'll stick with the ones I've got.

Correct,some people just keep churning out negativity regardless.
We actually have a split in the negativity camp at the moment with some suggesting Radford operates by the rule of FEAR over players and some suggesting he doesn't have the balls to drop Yeaman.

last few posts spot on, ive alway said radford isnt the man for the job but atm hes doing his best to pull it round, and i really hope he does, but some on here would find negative in anything,

We all know who we would pick and who we wouldn't but its not our decision. There's no point criticising the 17 before its even been announced. Its time to get behind whoever plays in what is one of the most important games of the season.

Leave the recriminations until later (hopefully they will be unnecessary).

Yeaman is rubbish and offers pretty much nothing, the try apart against Catalans, I have seen nothing to suggest Micheal's is any better, certainly not worth a quota place, Id drop them both if i'd had the choice. If Yeaman had made the mistake Micheal's did against Hudds, their would have been outrage on here.

Didn't mean to cause an argument with my squad post. Was just saying what my choice would be if I was in charge compared to what I think the reality will be.

FWIW, I agree Radders is doing his best to turn things round regarding our style of play and I echo hull2524 in saying that I hope he does make a success of it.

Surely all true fans hope he makes a success of it? Some may doubt he will succeed, but surely everyone wants him to?

Completely, much rather talk about the game, rather than how poorly coached we look. Just hope we carry last Sunday in to tomorrows game, then who knows, all of sudden starts looking much rosier. Just don't like not knowing which Hull team is going to turn up tomorrow

Yeaman is rubbish and offers pretty much nothing, the try apart against Catalans, I have seen nothing to suggest Micheal's is any better, certainly not worth a quota place, Id drop them both if i'd had the choice. If Yeaman had made the mistake Micheal's did against Hudds, their would have been outrage on here

Totally agree with the above. It could end up being a really sour end to Yeamos career cos fans already getting on his back, there wasnt booing as such at wire but all around me, who were all stood at that far side of the away end, just couldnt believe what he was doing with that kick try they got.

The fact of the matter is, there is no threat with ball in hand and he made a paltry 45 metres in that game. His attacking game has always been about power and and thats been invisible for 2 seasons now if we are honest. With Sa and Logan in the wings he has to go. Will Radford want to make too many changes to a winning team though? The answer we already know.

You'd think so but I've seen plenty of comments from people on the net calling themselves "true" fans who seem to want us to lose believing it will bring Radford's tenure to an end all the sooner.

We should be used to that by now

The most sensible post there's been on this subject.

yeaman should retire at the end of the season and keep his reputation intact.

Yeaman never contests a high ball to his part of the pitch.Its happened several times this season.He just ball watches and leaves it to others to clear up or make the mistake.
If you watch the replay of the Warrington match he could have easily cought the kick to the corner on the full but decided yet again to ball watch.The result was a try to Warrington.
Yeaman by todays standards of a super League centre is rubbish.
The galling thing is that he will once again get away with another poor performance and be selected.The fall guy for him this weekend will be Michaels.

It's at least 2 seasons too late for that.

He's not been great but his form has fallen off the edge of a cliff this year and if he stays on next year he'll be abysmal

There's been no talk of him leaving so I think we will have to stick with him. He's Radfords best mate so won't leave till Radford does