I think this post sums you up as a character. Flawed and thick.

Nice

AUP rule 2.1

and could even be libelous

I gave you time to amend the spelling. Didnt want to make you look thick....Would have been an easy win though.

That Anakin guy is a stroker and reminds me of why I would never be a Mod , f**k off to your own board , to**er

So in otherwords.
I (Tarquin Fuego) want to lambast rovers and their former chairman but then the very second someone reminds me of the facts that I conveniently forgot I'm going to start getting upset and then start throwing insults.
Have I missed anything?

Can you actually show evidence of these facts.

I've done business with Tim Wilby and have spoken with him about what went on when he tried buying rovers and his reasons behind it.

The documentry that is shown on that certain site only show certain bits and certainly didn't tell the whole story about what went on at the time and unless you where actually involved with the negotiations doubt you would have any true idea what went on.

And to state as fact you know what either Tim Wilby or the Irish bidders intended is rubbish...

The difference between what you state as facts and what Hull Fc fans state as facts is that your then chairman told everyone what his intentions and hopes were.

So discuss Bulls plight or it goes.

don't be mean, nothing is Anakin's fault, it's EVERYONE else who keeps him down.

no mention of the behaviour of the MODS from KR, I guess they are above the AUP?

They're probably listed under KR fans.

it makes me sick, I got banned from the KR board for having a dig at Gavin Miller's a bellend, RBA/PrincessLeyah have done much worse on here and yet nothing.

double standards

Sheldon, you're not so soft as to believe that.

Well a speculative thread descends into anarchy....

One more chance to talk about Bradford and potential loans from other clubs as per the first post.

So Bratfud will complete the fixtures this year.

Maybe the example the SPL are making of Rangers will be repeated in SL.....

Would Fax realistically take a spot on SL next year?

What about a Cumbrian team for 2 years, see how they go, not an established one, a new squad, playing games all over cumbria. Cumbrian Crusaders?

If I put "Bradford Bulls Rugby League" into any credit reference agency the response would be "don't be silly, they have no money, no assets and run at a constant loss"

so no, no loans, gifts or anything else from the rest of SL.

What there should be is a criminal investigation for those poor individuals that have lost their (combined) £500k, and prosecutions of the individuals involved.

Agree with that - I didn't give initially as the shysters who caused the problem were still there. There should certainly be an investigation of what was going on but I doubt the RFL have the [icojones[/i

That could well happen. I was going to use Farepack as an example, but the government backed down on that and refused to take on HSBC

As for credit agency, what doeas it say about poorhouse lane?

Sorry, must have hit Ctrl + V at the same time

If those that donated money were to contact the Fraud Squd then they would be duty bound to launch a formal investigation, in fact, if HMRC decide to get really involved then the tax aaffairs of the Bulls (and their directors) could be investigated in great detail, I wouldn't be sleeping to well if I were one of the former directors.

(TOTAL EXEMPTION SMALL)

A report to CPS could come in from the BIS department (former DTI) could lead to criminal investigations

Everything's not a conspiracy.

someone needs to make a complaint to trigger things, and then the whole house of cards would come crashing down, I doubt the RFL would come out of it well either.