I think we are all aware of what the problem has been, we should have been up there with Hudds.

Haha, true, just disappointing a thread like that gets hijacked by prats like him...

That's a compliment to some of the names I get called.

Thanks

Leave Renee out of it.

LOL.

Being that long since I saw a post from the missus that I'm not even sure if that's the correct spelling. Got me thinking now.

I know all teams can have ifs and buts however 2 points against Wakey which was simply a bizarre performance and 2 points away at Wigan which would have been fully deserved would have seen us just one point adrift of Hudds.

True but facts don't lie were still 8th and that isn't good enough

Shoulda, woulda, coulda.

We've lost as many games as we've won and we've been in the bottom half of the table for all but the one week between the Salford win and Leeds defeat in July.

Indeed - it does however illustrate the fine margins involved - maybe even demonstrates a poor quality league if we could have been so close.



I'm not sure what relevance a team's position during the season has as the season only ends after 27 games. As many folk said last year it's pointless talking about being 'almost fourth' when we finished sixth. Same argument applies the other way.

Plus the Cas game.

Or we could look at it another way we are 16 points behind Wigan and 15 Points away from Warrington

Saints have played away from home all season and are still 8 points ahead of us.

We lose to Cas next week we'd most likely then have to beat Wire which we wont then we'd most likely finish 9th.

But yes we are only 5 points behind Hudds in 4th.