Makes you wonder why...

She may have to give a BJ to get a BJB?

Excellent call by the club he knew how much the derby's mean to the club the players and us the fans and yet twice he has let us down by appauling behaviour which meant that he missed two of these games and let the team down.

OK we have aways been short on play makers and have now lost two in two months but you just can't condone behaviour like that! He was found guilty last week and given a week to appeal and what does he do on the 'Otley Run' last week end, but show just how worried he wasn't about the outcome of his appeal. There will no doubt be a few players concerned about the gap he leaves but none the less pleased with the outcome and I for one would rather we struggle for a while and are thin on the ground, than risk the long term damage that keeping him on the books would cause and the dangerous precedent it would set! Well done Hull FC!

Just my opinion of course, but I'm pleased with the outcome..

He's non-fed and quota basically. Plus had a few injury issues iirc. Don't think he has any dark secrets. Only reason I can imagine Hull being reluctant is if they have other irons in the fire (eg Sammut) or want to leave the space open in the hope that a top player becomes available mid-season.

We've got Schifcofske, Sammut, Kear and Hanbury, when he finally get's here to cover fullback. We've got enough problems here in Wrexham without adding a disruptive player thanks

Edited

No idea what his disciplinary record was like at Leeds or the Roosters, but even if it wasn't unblemished the club may have thought he'd be smart enough to clean up his act. Turns out he's as dumb as a box of dirt. Can't really blame the club for his lack of brains.

Correct decision to get rid and a pretty brave one given the problems it leaves us with. It would have been easy to slap him with some other punishment and let him stay. Well done to all concerned.

I'm always in favour of the club taking this kind of action. The players are in a very priveledged position and if they cant respect it they dont deserve to play for any club let alone this one.

Cheeky

Well done to the club hierarchy. Brave decision but the right one IMO.

No to phelps. I'd rather wait and see if we can use the quota space on a better quality player in a few months

Good decision by the club. It seems like they've taken their time and gone with the three strikes and you're out policy, which is more than fair.

It's a shame because he did show glimpses of excellent play, and if he sorted out his inconsistency, daft errors & misdemeanours off the pitch, he could be knocking at the door for the England squad.

I reckon some club will pick him up, and they'll have a bargain, albeit a bargain with discipline issues.

Well done Hull FC. Well done Richard Agar and the Board of Directors. Now to focus on adding to a disciplined squad and getting results.

Like i said yesterday the meeting was held and today we see the outcome.
Very brave shout by the club which shows the correct level or response for the administration towards a player who has let us down and also sends a clear message to everyone else now as well!!!
I am pleased the club has stood by its guns regardless of the gap it leaves however i do hope Jordan gets some help and advice that he can learn from and move on because he is a talented lad regardless and hope he can move on too, hes a decent lad in the wrong crowd with bad advice and being led astray.. this kick in the nuts will hopefully make his smell the roses!!
New player by weekend!!

Well done FC hope the lad learns his lesson.

can't see phelps coming.by the time he gets a visa,permit etc,and gets up to match fitness it will be halfway through the season.Cant see leeds letting bjb go either,considering he has been heavily involved pre season for them.i still think a punt on Aaron Murphy at wakey would be a good move(plays both fullback and wing).

Fully back Agar and the board on this, definitely the right decision.

I just hope this doesn't get used as an excuse for poor results later in the season, Agar took a gamble on a known troublemaker and it didn't pay off so he has to take some of the responsibility.

well said

Time for Whiting to cement his place at full back now!!!!
Cracking in the air, reads the game well, faster than wellens so cant be all bad

Good decision

How does this effect our salary cap? Do we now have 100% of his wages to spend?

before his first warning here at FC where else had he been sanctioned??

From twitter - on the 31st Jan
easthulllegend :
@OGRE08 instead of Booming Mathers give Tansey one, he could do with it after letting his team mates and fans down, again.
OGRE08
@easthulllegend haha, I'll boom both of them. They deserve it.

shows that the players were far from impressed.

Good player, one of our best attacking options last season, however its the correct decision, most of us would love the chance to pull on the black and white jersey and he has just taken it for granted (on a decent wage too).
I fear now as we was probably already two players short as it was and with the season starting on Sunday it doesn't look good...

I think that as he's gone before the season starts we'll have 100% of his wages to spend on the cap if we want to.

I'm not to clever on the salary cap issues , how will it work regards that ?

Any chance of some evidence of Tansey being a 'known troublemaker' before we signed him? Because on the face of it your post could be taken as a desperate attempt to blame Agar at all costs, regardless of the facts.