He wasn't still moving in the refs view as he called held, and the knock on by Lyne wasn't a knock on in any sense, but hey, you carry on.

We lost, I'm over it, seems that some can't get over the fact they won and just move on to the next game.

On a thread thats your full of lot bleating about TMFMISL being on report thats rich

its annoying that wher called the whinos but looking on your board christ u cant stop going on about it,and i think u lot of got a short memory or just stupid by singing y warrington to us may i ask who nocked you out again?

Bailey is a WUM and gets under players skin and they shouldnt get wound up by him as there mind is then no longer fully on the game but more about a revenge mission. I agree Bailey did elbow Radford in the head but by no means was it on purpose, he was just trying to get up for a quick PTB. Some refs might not have sent Radford off but he is leaving himself open to it by punching a player in the head several times from what looked unprovoked.

James Graham has been found out by Baileys tactics in the past especially in big matches and he is one of the best props in the world.

Would this be the same Bailey who was cited last week for the same offence in the 80th minute. Hopefully they will have a better view of it this time as last weeks was inconclusive!

Sounds about right, Radford up, no mention of Bailey even being cited!!!

Radford has a case to answer simply because of the red card.

No other players are mentioned on the RFL's disciplinary page, that doesn't mean they won't be

Pitty radford didn't do more damage on the ****

I hope he tries it on sunday cause he will get more of that from a few of our men

By the looks of it - Bailey has gotten away with it, and although Radford should get SOS, he will no doubt be handed a one match ban so that the RFL can make an example of him.

On the other hand the RFL have shown that you can elbow people as hard as you like, and as many times as you like in the head during a tackle.

Sorry, no you are wrong. I have an unbiased eye. I watched the game not really bothered who won. I don't support Leeds, nor do I rate Bailey, but all I saw was Radford hold him down too long, Bailey struggle to get up and catch Radford head. Radford was the one who totally lost it.

Dont the hull fans get tired of looking for someone else to blame?

For what its worth I thought hull played well enough to win it with 12 men, and would probably gone on to win with a full compliment.

Good look this coming weekend.

Regardless of whether the elbows were deliberate or not, the attempted head-butt on Long was. If that's not a red card, then what is?

Luckily he missed,and Long didn`t milk it.

I've asked three Rhinos fans this on here but no-one seems to be able to answer, maybe you will:

Do you think four sharp jabs of the elbow is a good way of getting to your feet and what was he aiming for?

Anybody thats played before will know what I mean when I say you can tell where peoples heads are when your being tackled.
Elbowing it once could be seen as an accident, but several times is a clear way of trying to hurt an opposition player.

Exactly. I also made reference to the fact in an earlier thread that Radford would not have been able to tell whether it was a fist or an elbow, for all he knew it was Bailey attacking [ihim[/i.

Spot on..
ANother porter made the point once the elbow makes contact once anyone would realise it so why did he feel the need to do it several times more?...this proves the intention imo. Added to the fact the animal then decided to try and head butt longy with intention I can't understand why people can say he done nothing wrong..
Radders should publicly offer him to a boxing match ( for charity of course ) to give him the good pasting he deserves... for a good cause obviously

top idea

maybe some of the L**ds supporters will attend and let an FC fan elbow them 4 times in the head and say "it was nothing" after the event too!

rob burroughs is baileys minder.

so back to the thread, has he been charged with anything?

No he hasn't. Suprise suprise. (according to The Gaurdian)

If not, it's an utter disgrace. Does the fact that his attempted head-butt didn't connect make him less guilty? The intent was very clearly there and the disciplinary panel should be ashamed of themselves if they take no action.

Use of forearm in 10th minute (Radford)
Decision No charge
Details of Charge / Reason for NF Player attempts to regain feet and play the ball, forearm makes unintentional contact with opponent, provokes opponent but no misconduct

It make unintentional contact 4 times