A member of the media has spoke to FC's media manager and he confirms the club have banned him

Are you talking about Rob Chadwick?

They should ban him as well, after all the stuff he posts as paintboy on the "hidden" forum.

Fact of the matter is the thing is banned, at least they have given a reason for it, remind me again why the airlie bird wasn't allowed at Poorhouse Lane not so long back?

All people should remember is the pettiness and anomosity that exists between the two clubs at boardroom level is all traceable back to Hudgell and his cronies.

Just get rid of silly mascots per se..........totally stupid.

Think he is:



Who immediately backpedalled when asked who "they" were:




...admitting Rufus had a letter confirming "they" were the SMC:



Having said all this - I really hope Rule contacts the SMC to suggest that the "indefinite" period the ban will last is removed before our next home game to Rovers. Unless the "obscene" allegations are true (which seem incredible, TBH) this is the sensible and right way for an unbitter CEO to demonstrate his pragmatism.

Right here are the facts!!!

Rovers jestured to the crowd in a very provocative way at the Derby. The SMC have sent a letter to the person wearing the outfit saying that he, not the mascot is banned from The KC. Rufus is not banned from the KC.

There is a code of conduct for all mascots set by the RL and this obviouly over steps that too, so no doubt the RL will get involved, however as I see it it has nothing to do with our club at all!! It is perhaps a bit over the top butis certainly not acceptable behaviour at a family sport, from someone on the pitch with a level of responsibility! If a player did it there would be calls for his head!!! But I stress it is the SC that has deemed this unreasonable behaviour and not the club!

So I was right all along. First time for everything

Apologies to James Rule here please.

you was the one who brought his name up on here

I think the SMC had its feathers ruffled and did a little dickie bird tell them,blah, blah blah. A big fuss over nothing - Airlie was banned and I didn't hear a furore.

You're barred - get over it

Did I? At my age I can't remember what I did 5 minutes ago.

Maybe there should be another thread started for those who were way too quick to post their 'disgust' with our club to offer their apologies. What a joke.

I wonder if this is why the 'bird' who did the announcing last season has been replaced?

So has rob chadwick

You're getting so mixed up now maybe you should have a test for dementia. I have never suggested that the board should be sacked. I think they're doing a great job in most aspects. Even if I didn't I'd hardly bother campaigning for people to sack themselves. Likewise I've never had anything to do with meetings "down the pub" so can't put anything on any agenda. My agar out campaign is well and truly me on my own



You should check back on some of kingston convict's posts as I think it's him you need to be directing your comments at

Don't go holding your breath.

Unbelievable how many people are willing to wade into [iour own club[/i with both feet without knowing the facts. Get a grip FFS.

Long said in the HDM:
"I had a meeting with Rich yesterday about how Saints play, the moves they call and I'm helping Rich the best I can to make sure we come out on top."

Meetings to analyse the opposition, whatever next?

I'm staying out of this . Mascots not my strong point !

I can imagine it now:

Longy: Rich, do you want me to tell you all about saints' game plan, their calls, who to watch out for, their tactics and their moves?

agar: Tactics? Yeah please, had garlic last night and my breath stinks

I find it bloody incredulous we get all this fuss over a flaming red and white, flightless, plug ugly, east of the city sort or bird thingy



Omelet anyone

What everybody getting upset for ..It.s effing ugly anyway and it want

ing Now Airlie (god love him )

..If you show your

you get a ban

Yet don't you think that by agreeing to support the testimonial this may have been time to put the animosity to bed.

Healthy rivalry and dislike for each other is good for the game in this city. Lets face it it'd be a bit dull if we all got on but the pettiness that goes on sometimes is nothing short of emabarrassing (and that goes both ways so I'm no way saying that we are taking the moral high ground). Mascots are good for the games, the young kids love them. It was a good sight when Rufus and the girlie bird came out together on the hovercraft at CP a year or so ago and gives off the right image of the game.

If as has been quoted he was banned for shaking the rear of a stuffed bird suit at the north corner of the east stand then it is a bit of an over reaction. (lets face it does anyone believe he bared his ar5e!!!)

If it was any more I'm pretty certain there would have been at least 4,000 pages of shock posted on here.

I hope that if it was the SMC that have imposed this ban then it is a sign of things to come and by July the top of the north end of the east stand will be empty when we visit next. The morons that spend all game time flicking the V's, doing the W**ker signs (especially the n0b doing the throat cutting signs every ten mins) and generally threatening whoever the opposition fans are will also have been given bans from the KC.

One of your players gave us fans the one finger salute at Cardiff, your directors seem incapable to give an interview without the digs at us, your club right from the top appear to be obsessed with us. Now if the bird has acted innapropiatley then he will face the consquences, like I have already said the problem is your club are unprofessional, they need to focus on their own club, stop with the bitter comments directed towards Hull FC!! you do not hear directors of other clubs making unprofessional comments like that..Pathetic

Morning...