I think its more the case they he is at the helm of a company who have to share a stadium. Duffen would love it if he and City has sole access to the ground.

Only as a Premier League side, they couldn't afford it if they dropped a division or two.

What problems, plenty of clubs ground share with other sports and if a date is already pencilled in and pointed out to the premier league they would make sure the fixtures are changed to suit.

We already get similar with Manchester United and Man City with the PL making sure home games are not at the same time or same day. Same with Everton Liverpool.

I agree with that and thats why I think this shows his true colours !

Regardless of anything else he is doing a crap job at City right now.

Since when was he responsible for the on field performances Paul?

Not sure thats correct as FC must give his stadium company around 40 percent of its income.
I just think hosting a RL International would probably be a good will gesture to international RL fans during which his company could see them making very little profit or even a small loss and he aint prepared to think of the fans first for once and do this !

Only My opinion though !!

Recruitment requires money, if all you ever do is loan players then you are asking for it.

Duffen isn't the problem with recruitment Paul.

He offered £12m for Navarro, when he turned them down they signed nobody else and instead sold Turner.

He and Brown are both responsible, Duffen more so as he has thr power to sack Brown but imo is just raking in the money during these two seasons and then will be happy to be a championshipclub again. Stoke spent £18m, City spent next to nothing.

Anyway it's about Duffen rather than City, otherwise I will have to lock it

Duffen is the one in the press calling city fans and their chants pathetic because they are not happy with the way their season is heading.


That could be an idea for a new thread....Is booing justified ??




Duffen is the one who is yet to satisfy many a city supporter about where the clubs money has gone !!!!!

Of course, we're allowed a soft porn thread but not to discuss City.

No football on a rugby clubs forum, shocker!

I wonder how many Hull FC threads they have on City sites?

As many as they do soft porn, Hunks, Tsunami etc. Id imagine.

Well I know which I prefer!

The Hunks thread?

Quote ="Chris28"The Hunks thread?'" Oi! No but this one isn't too bad! viewtopic.php? ... c&start=90

Quote ="Chris28"The Hunks thread?'" Oi! No but this one isn't too bad! viewtopic.php? ... c&start=90

I am not a great lover of the present management at the KC, city or FC. I have a lot of time for Pearson, he cared about the KC and had a passion for RL. His passion was dmaped down by our board who where at odds with him for most of the time one way or another.

My understanding is that Duffen and FC have better working relationship, now is this a good thing or a bad one?

I do think that certain interests would remove FC if they could, they can't and they see FC as the one thing stopping them gaining full control of a civic amenity. School finals where supposed to be played at the KC as part of its set up, I see they have now finished and even the council is renting parts of the stadium.

Its seems its a power struggle and the world cup bid will become part of the agrument soon. We will be in the way come the summer 2018, expanding the stadium will take a few months and they will want full excess to the stadium for the duration of the group games. They will not want our markings all over the pitch, spoil the view for the pundits to wax lyrical all over it.

There is no way will Hull be hosting World Cup games, group qualifiers or otherwsie Ian,

I know that and you know that trouble is Duffen & co see it as a way to expand the capacity and get the council to at least part fund it.

There is a very large wedge of KC money laying idle in banks because the present administration has no desire to spend it and they can not use it to keep the comm charge down.

When did England get the 2018 World Cup?

It hasn't, which is why I said the KC wont be needed, I cannot see them sending the World Cup here so soon after an Olympics.

I was told that when the RFL asked Duffen about the KC hosting an International game he was all for it and asked them to send him a list of dates that he could send to the FA to be considered when compiling the PL fixtures. When it came down to it the RFL gave one date only which was no good as he'd already had the dispensations for Fair and the Clipper launch. The RFL's lack of flexibility was the reason we failed to get an international game.

while were kinda talking city,, is it true there is talk of them building a new boothferry park and moving?? got mentioned to me in pub

FFS