well done

Tbh I don't like Horne at fb. As I've said before I rate Horne as a runner of the ball at 6 but as a creative player he is one of the worst 6's at being creative in the league. Maybe this is down to players around him but seriously all he knows is a drop off to Tickle or a little grubber.

no, but id also not say anything to there faces either,couldnt realy see myself going up to any of the players and saying your sh-te



would you do it karl?

They don't need telling though really, they should already know.

Id be more worried about yourself if i was you



And if we get past you yeah we might well do that, they take the acclaim when things are going well

Maybe if you took there gonads out of your mouth you could

good point

im just saying people have plenty to say on here,but when a opportunity arises to tell them face to face i doubt there will,thats my point

Who's table are you on???

not worried in the slightest



ill be watching every step you take karl

just with a few friends karl

Is that what you call them,hmmmm

Which team do they support???

the mighty black and whites,your point is?

say what your thinking karl

good night karl,may see you tonight

My best 6/7/13 lineup would be Toppo/Sterling/Norton now we would win trophies on the back of that.

Makes you think doesnt it about our recruitment over last 5 years

TBH from a pure "fit"ness perspective I think we have the best set of halves in SL. Horne and Thorman are much easier on the eye than Pryce and Long or Burrow and McGuire. We have some excellent strength in depth in this area too - Tommy Lee and Berro aren't too shabby.

Some clubs really struggle in this respect; Brough, Drew for example. Rovers are the worst though - Dobson and Cooke - a double-bagger combo

A bit early in the day to be thinking of 'fit' blokes, did you miss something last night

I would tell them what I thought, I would not say 'Oi you're shiit' but I would say the peformances are not acceptable and the rugby is boring.

One of my favourite sides the 2004 team.

You should start a chant at the next home game - 'The peformances are not acceptable and the rugby is boring, and you know it is!'

Mine also. Last time we had a side and a coach capable of playing attractive, attacking rugby. Only a horrendous end of season injury crisis stopped us from being realistic challengers that season.



We've been on a downhill slide in terms of quality and playing style ever since IMO - despite the CC win in 2005 and GF in 2006.

I would have loved to see what we could have achieved without that horrible run of injuries. Its also interesting to note that despite comments on here about Bomber playing good rugby, at the time people wanted a change as he had been in charge for 5 years and we felt we needed a new coach to progress further.

My recollection is that pretty much everyone wanted him to stay but he wanted to try his hand in the NRL.

Interesting comparison between his time with us and his time with saints. he left saints after one GF win (I think) but left them with the seeds of a great team that went on to dominate the game with a succession of top quality coaches and acquisitions, whereas he left us with the seeds of a top class side which went on to a cup win, appear in a GF and has then been systematically dismantled by a succession of inferior coaches, poor recruitment and incompetent management at the club