[*
Thanks - any idea on how you'll line up?

You asking so you can tip Radford off and hopefully give him some coaching tips?

I'm asking because I'm interested in our next game which is against Wigan. The make-up of their team is an important factor. Unfortunately I expect us to have around 5-6 players out, interested in their relative position. Not every single post has to be slating Lee Radford.

Bloody apologist.

Sorry.

Depends who you are. It seems compulsory to some on here.

Not saying it does as that does get pretty boring. And where was I directly slating Lee?
It was plainly obvious why you were asking anyway but get the sense of humour denoted by the lol icon must have bypassed you.

And on the flip side so is the constant defending and ass kissing of posters by certain other posters.
Sometimes people just have to agree to disagree and leave it at that.

I'd be a rubbish coach. We'd have runners, a virtual ban on the ball back inside and 40-20s. It'd never work.

Now that's better and you'd certainly get my backing with that crazy style of rugby your proposing.

You really are sad. You know what i meant - In all sport when a team is playing well players want to be part of it but when the chips are down players may not rush back as quickly as they might of done. Thats all i was saying. To try and shape it into your sad little agenda is rather pathetic and epitomises whats wrong with this sad little board run by mrs queen bee know nothing.

Bless.

If you don't like it....

Oh look its one of the queens little minions

Anyone seen Standee?

Grow up.

But unless there are posts I've missed, not quite one he has made. Not saying I agree with him on this or even most matters, but your interpretation seems off here (to me, at least) on the accusation you're throwing at him.

You must have missed this one...

You may have quoted the wrong post. That one doesn't appear to say what you (and Mrs B) think it does.

It's saying our players out injured would choose to play if we were doing better. What interpretation is needed other than deception is afoot?

Never happend before has it?

A coach goes and a player suddenly "comes back from injury"

I wonder what injury Bailey has

No, it actually doesn't, really. Especially when followed up with this:


It says that if we were doing well, perhaps some players may work harder to regain fitness more quickly, or maybe even try to declare themselves fit to play slightly earlier than they should.

Absolutely nowhere can I see it mentioned in one of Sebasteeno's posts:





I'm not familiar with this style of posting, have I included enough quotes?

Ha ha ha Mrs (queen) B well and truly owned!!!!







Now if we can get back to the point i was making before it got twisted - are some of the injuries slightly indicative of players not wanting to play? Many have asked why the likes of Thompson and Green are suddenly injured when no injuries have been reported previously - to be frank can any of it be proportioned to players not wanting to play for Radford?

Only in your mental fooking mind.
Stop hypothesising!
It's [iapaulling[/i.

micky paea charged with raising the knee v leeds

grade b

no doubt that will be a 1 match ban






ho hum