More from the FC media day on Humberside. If you skip to about 45mins in you'll hear the Jordan Lane interview https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/p0khb ... are-mobile

More from the FC media day on Humberside. If you skip to about 45mins in you'll hear the Jordan Lane interview https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/p0khb ... are-mobile

Really hope the Moy train isn't being over hyped - but it is high praise indeed. Think the back 5 are quite interchangeable, for me it will be Ed Chamberlain who makes way in the backs ( assuming all others fit ). Little to choose between the other 3 wingers - Lewis marginally behind but little in it. Was impressed with Harvey last year, put well behind him the errors of previous seasons. Saw an interview where he was impressive, clearly hacked off with the inability to maintain intensity or a game plan. Said 'its just not good enough' - showed passion for the shirt which is great.

For me Martin would be the first choice winger, the kid looks SL ready. Hopefully gets the nod over Barron, who did improve last season tbf to him.

[quote="FC Callum":16hy5vo1][attachment=0:16hy5vo1]IMG_1650.jpeg[/attachment:16hy5vo1] Looks like he’s been on the cas forum to inform them of our hammering[/quote:16hy5vo1] I noticed that myself. Funnier still is that he went through the effort to register there and post that and not one soul has acknowledged his post. Does anyone actually know what happened in the behind closed doors game? He is the only person I've seen mention it. Besides, my experience of these games is that they are essentially just opposed training sessions. You'll run through a few sets and then stop play to discuss things or to try something different. The score is incidental, in fact I doubt anyone even keeps score.

Looking at the amount of energy this guy is sapping on here whilst he sits in his bedroom licking the the windows and watching us train whilst expounding fantasy theories on things he actually knows nothing about (because a few of us actually do know a bit about them) its about time the mods had a close look at his ramblings and his posting history and the actual constructive input he has on here. But I guess the attention he gets from posts like this will have his mother emptying and washing his socks at very regular intervals.

[quote="Mr. Zucchini Head":vb1hkg1f][quote="FC Callum":vb1hkg1f][attachment=0:vb1hkg1f]IMG_1650.jpeg[/attachment:vb1hkg1f] Looks like he’s been on the cas forum to inform them of our hammering[/quote:vb1hkg1f] I noticed that myself. Funnier still is that he went through the effort to register there and post that and not one soul has acknowledged his post. Does anyone actually know what happened in the behind closed doors game? He is the only person I've seen mention it. Besides, my experience of these games is that they are essentially just opposed training sessions. You'll run through a few sets and then stop play to discuss things or to try something different. The score is incidental, in fact I doubt anyone even keeps score.[/quote:vb1hkg1f] [url=https://www.hulldailymail.co.uk/sport/rugby-league/zak-hardaker-explains-hull-fc-9905258:vb1hkg1f]Another decent and interesting interview with Hardaker in the HDM (cue the meltdowns across the river ), he touches on the session with York a little, which was held in ...................................................... York.[/url:vb1hkg1f]

[quote="Mr. Zucchini Head":264tz7gk]I noticed that myself. Funnier still is that he went through the effort to register there and post that and not one soul has acknowledged his post. Does anyone actually know what happened in the behind closed doors game? He is the only person I've seen mention it. Besides, my experience of these games is that they are essentially just opposed training sessions. You'll run through a few sets and then stop play to discuss things or to try something different. The score is incidental, in fact I doubt anyone even keeps score.[/quote:264tz7gk] Which forum was that he went on From what I gather, started with full team for 20 mins, then free for all with interchanges. Even academy players. Do t believe a score was kept

[quote="The Dentist Wilf":3qornfhf]Looking at the amount of energy this guy is sapping on here whilst he sits in his bedroom licking the the windows and watching us train whilst expounding fantasy theories on things he actually knows nothing about (because a few of us actually do know a bit about them) its about time the mods had a close look at his ramblings and his posting history and the actual constructive input he has on here. But I guess the attention he gets from posts like this will have his mother emptying and washing his socks at very regular intervals.[/quote:3qornfhf] Yesterday he posted that Rovers would win the league comfortably and also get to Wembley.

[quote="Chris71":3tz1gals][url=https://www.hulldailymail.co.uk/sport/rugby-league/zak-hardaker-explains-hull-fc-9905258:3tz1gals]Another decent and interesting interview with Hardaker in the HDM (cue the meltdowns across the river ), he touches on the session with York a little, which was held in ...................................................... York.[/url:3tz1gals][/quote:3tz1gals] He needs a new set of binoculars

[quote="mwindass":34s1wyaj]He needs a new set of binoculars[/quote:34s1wyaj] Indeed, but as they say too much of a certain thing makes you go blind.

[quote="Offy86":3aiebyty]Which forum was that he went on From what I gather, started with full team for 20 mins, then free for all with interchanges. Even academy players. Do t believe a score was kept[/quote:3aiebyty] Casforum.co.uk I went on there earlier to see what they were saying about this weekends game. The answer was, not much. But I did see that comment from him with no replies.

[quote="Chris71":lhxip9ne]Indeed, but as they say too much of a certain thing makes you go blind.[/quote:lhxip9ne] Who said that?

[quote="Roam Ranger":268sbptj]Who said that? [/quote:268sbptj] roy orbison

[quote="The Dentist Wilf":15s8gesm]Looking at the amount of energy this guy is sapping on here whilst he sits in his bedroom licking the the windows and watching us train whilst expounding fantasy theories on things he actually knows nothing about (because a few of us actually do know a bit about them) its about time the mods had a close look at his ramblings and his posting history and the actual constructive input he has on here. But I guess the attention he gets from posts like this will have his mother emptying and washing his socks at very regular intervals.[/quote:15s8gesm] Don't worry Pete, it's been dealt with appropriately.

Was it decision day for salford today as to whether they had to sell players?

[quote="dandaman":8glqq0o0]Was it decision day for salford today as to whether they had to sell players?[/quote:8glqq0o0] I’ve lost track. I thought D-Day was a week last Tuesday; then it became Salford were confident of having a takeover deal done last weekend. I think today is important as it’s pay day. I think if the players don’t get paid, then that can become a breach on their contracts and allow players to freely seek other employment. I’m sure others may know the exact consequences on not paying players on time.

[quote="Chris71":24tgsehx]Indeed, but as they say too much of a certain thing makes you go blind.[/quote:24tgsehx] And hey presto Rovers announce they are to be sponsored by Specsavers. Very apt when you consider how many Wan... sorry spectacle wearers there appears to be over there!!!

[quote="The Dentist Wilf":3uymeu2m]And hey presto Rovers announce they are to be sponsored by Specsavers. Very apt when you consider how many Wan... sorry spectacle wearers there appears to be over there!!![/quote:3uymeu2m] A total waste of a sponsorship on Specsavers part. Rovers fans can spot an opposition forward pass from 400 yards away.

I see Derek has been making comments that the game should leave SKY as the TV deal isn't big enough. His view is if the average TV audience all bought SL+ the game would get more money...which could be true but big problem there is SKY are filming and producing the games (and I dread to think what it would be like if the RFL were in charge, probably film on Sharp camcorder from the 90s ) That would be a big gamble for the game, it's not certain that causal viewers would buy the app and the game has a lot of older fans who aren't streamers. Also when SKY don't show a sport it's dead to them, no mentions on Sports News and we'd lose coverage that way.

[quote="UllFC":gnk049pb]I see Derek has been making comments that the game should leave SKY as the TV deal isn't big enough. His view is if the average TV audience all bought SL+ the game would get more money...which could be true but big problem there is SKY are filming and producing the games (and I dread to think what it would be like if the RFL were in charge, probably film on Sharp camcorder from the 90s ) That would be a big gamble for the game, it's not certain that causal viewers would buy the app and the game has a lot of older fans who aren't streamers. Also when SKY don't show a sport it's dead to them, no mentions on Sports News and we'd lose coverage that way.[/quote:gnk049pb] I have no idea what it costs to cover a game live with an outside broadcast but it must be significant for a main game you would think, plus the initial capital outlay. Who would pay for all of that? There must be a fair few people employed full time doing it at SKY

[quote="Rugby Raider":14shnqt2]A total waste of a sponsorship on Specsavers part. Rovers fans can spot an opposition forward pass from 400 yards away.[/quote:14shnqt2] At least we may be able to see you lot right down at the bottom end of the league table now?

[quote="Funk-Doc":2hq7ruhf]At least we may be able to see you lot right down at the bottom end of the league table now?[/quote:2hq7ruhf] You'll need more than Specsavers to be able to see anything in your trophy cabinet.

[quote="Funk-Doc":x2bdjddm]At least we may be able to see you lot right down at the bottom end of the league table now?[/quote:x2bdjddm] do hey have x-ray specs for those in the new golf stand?

[quote="Funk-Doc":2qd0ezyr]At least we may be able to see you lot right down at the bottom end of the league table now?[/quote:2qd0ezyr] You’ll need some really strong lenses to see all the way back to ‘85

do Specsavers do hindsight tests???