Except he's contracted to rovers and the Hull players don't want him after he was banging thompson's sister (in law?)

*Dazzling*
Based on his average tenure at a club you could be right, although 13 games a season's not an amazing return.

Been a big critic of Griffin but he could make the right wing spot his own for next season with a lot more effort and work on his defence.
I would use Griffin this season off the bench as an impact second row and get him used to work and tackling.

Yeh I know all thst, just could see it happening

So can I. He won't be at Rovers next season if they aren't in SL. I'll be amazed if there isn't a clause in his contract that releases him if a SL club comes calling.

i wonder if radders is knocking at the rfls' door? www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/sport/ru ... -1-8617051

i wonder if radders is knocking at the rfls' door? www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/sport/ru ... -1-8617051

Wow. Would love to see the criteria.
Can think of more deserving players for this scheme than Lomax.

[url=http://www.hulldailymail.co.uk/sport/rugby-league/rugby-league-news/hull-fc-eye-return-mickey-139225Return for Micky Paea[/url

A bit unexpected. I'd rather a 2nd rower but would certainly add some size

Talking to Mickey Paea. Would be very good signing if we could keep him fit, play off the bench for some real impact. Pearson said door would always be open for him when he left.

Would make the pack formidable .
He enjoyed his time here so could see it happening

We seem to look for the right character as much as playing ability so he certainly fits the bill there. I think the return of Hadley and Abdul could well be like having 2 new signings as well. Hadley definitely returning a much approved player.

Was very popular with the squad and management.

The only worry with paea is his injury record since he left but I guess there are slim pickings to be had so you have to take risks. I still think we need another 2nd rower personally more than a prop

:17ln8v8y
It's the paragraph, why do we always have rules that can be circumvented with £££'s?

Move Watts to the backrow, had a few spells there this year and looked really dangerous

Imagine a pack of

Taylor/Paea
Houghton
Green/Bowden
Mini
Watts
Manu

Injuries are the big concern, but good player when fit and would offer us good impact, I'd sign him on a 2 year deal.

Have to trust Motu and Radford.

More likely that Watts would go to 13 than second row, but yes I think that would be the plan if Paea does return (or maybe Green).

I liked him the first time, and he's a slightly different style to our current props and would add a new dimension coming off the bench. But as others have already said his injury record isnt great lately and I'm not sure its a priority to sign another prop, albeit he would improve our pack. If we are going to have to throw a stack of money at him to get round the new rules then I would say move on.

If you're really bored, read the immigration rules - full of stuff like that since 2008 and relaxed for cash since 2010

Im not that bored Chris!

Taylor
Houghton
Bowden
Manu
Hadley
Watts

Bench...
Paea
Green
Mini
Washy

That bench would be massively stronger than anything we've fielded all year. Starting pack not to shoddy either
More behind that as well by next year with another pre season
Turgut
Fash
Mashi

Taylor
Houghton
Green
Minichiello
Manu
Watts

Bench of

Bowden
Washbrook
Hadley
Paea

Whats your reasoning behind Green having a starting spot, not been argumentative, a genuine question

I would have Green as he is solid and the other two offer more impact, particularity against tiring defences.

Not to mention Thompson...................

I was a big fan of Mickey but personally wouldn't take him back . 32 next year suspect injury record and guessing decent wage to get him back over here .