Then do that before you release information that you have signed him.

Our club is a absolute laughing stock. not only do we not go out and get a recognised top quality number 7. Not had one since 1991 {Greg Mackey} We then supposidly sign a player who has not played for 8 months without first doing a medical. Then 2 weeks later release him.
The management of the club needs to decide if they are up to the job and if not ship out and get people in who can manage.
Our so called chief exc would much rather go on tour {to Ireland} with a rugby union team then do his paid job.
This incompertance has to stop or we have no chance of beening anything other then also rans in the competion.

Just a couple of points amongst all the hysteria.

Reardon's contract was contingent upon two conditions...

1. His full recovery from his achilles injury
2. Getting a non-custodial sentence

Clearly, he's failed on the first condition. I doubt he'll have been paid, because until he met the first condition he didn't have an actual contract with us - hence how he can be released swiftly and easily now.

Carry on.

Well no, I don't know fook all really.

we were clearly lied to this evening though, Rule was going on about what a good signing it was only 2 hours ago

You named him in a 19 man squad so he has to be contracted and registered with the RFL for that to happen

Dont state facts Kosh.....the muppets dont like it.

Good should never have signed him in the first place. lets close this chapter and move on to the next who knows we might be able to close another chapter soon with any luck

It's hard to keep that kind of information quiet, and if they'd tried and failed it would have been blamed on his criminal record rather than medical grounds.

At least they had the sense to make the contract dependent on his fitness this time. One step at a time...

How about we just got scan results?

Agreed, but the club should never have associated themselves with him in the first place.

Yes but this information was never given to the fans who piled up pages of venom towards his signing. Another sign that your board dont give a crap about the fans or their reactions.

Being registered with the RFL only requires a valid contract [ioffer[/i agreed by both club and player.

HTH

Pretty sure he was on a pay as you play.

Yes it was.

HTH

I'll take your word for it

Fixed typo.

Were we? Or didn't Rule have the full facts during the programme?

Hardly seems much point in telling a blatant lie just 90 minutes before releasing the truth, does there?

NOW it it time for the joke of a board and the joke of a coaching team to p!$$ off and leave this great club alone.

i am ashamed to be a Hull fan

Im sorry I do not frequent the FC website. So your telling me that when you signed Reardon the website stated the conditions.

You just couldnt make it up could you.

Feel sorry for you, the supporters. The Board are making you a laughing stock.

there was no indication that he was having a medical or anything though, what would have been wrong saying that Reardon's signing was still subject to a medical?

Wouldn't put it past him, Surely a decision to release him and meet with all the parties involved to confirm it takes longer than 90 minutes

Don't you just love RLFans and its double standards.



The board are lambasted for signing Reardon

The board are lambasted for getting rid of Reardon.



GO FIGURE!!!