I don't I'd have Washy at 13 before anyone at the club.

Horne was Hull's worst player on Saturday. If Thorman had performed as badly as Horne did, there would have been a 300 post thread and a bunch of morons with avatars saying he is crap.

yeah I forgot about Washy another very good option

Disagree about Horne being our worst player but fully agree with what you are saying with regards to Thorman.

Is the link to Hornes poor perfromances the fact that he has moved back to 6 maybe he wanted the fullback spot and now is as feed up as we are.

not ever going slag this guy off the effort he has put into this club since he was 16

As for the rest Houghton to 9 berrigan to 7 lee to Dewsbury.

Here are my thoughts..


:1so13lhkDowes:1so13lhk is Hull top tackler for the club and works hard every match, maybe too hard which is why he looks tired. - Keep him in

:1so13lhkTickle:1so13lhk has been poor for a while but now Hall has gone we dont have a goalkicker so that is why he is picked - Drop him

:1so13lhkRadford:1so13lhk looks like he is just not trying - Drop him

:1so13lhkBerrigan:1so13lhk injured - Drop him

:1so13lhkThorman

for me

Radford has had it

Horne's off the boil but I feel he could turn it around

Tickle, Dowes, King, Thackray aren't pulling their weight

Berrigan should not be playing with his injury

and Manu, Moa, Maloney, Raynor, Calderwood should go find another club, because they are wasted here, Agar has no idea how to use them.

and Thorman is trying, but he's just hopeless

and also my opinion!!

ive thought that tickle has played ok and dowes aswell,but id deffo get shut ov radders as just walks into tackles,drop yeaman been poor and bring back hall,kingy drop him

Tickle and Dowes are being overplayed imo...Agar said with us signing Thorman we could spell Tickle....havent seen it happen yet.

i think because tickle had played well at the begining ov the season he`s kept putting him on for the majority/whole ov the game and dowes has had a fairly good season so far just no one to back him up...as usual.

ballcocks. he was poor by his standards, but he is nowhere near as bad as Thorman. if you rate Thorman so well have him back,

washy is injured at present which is whiting was suggested

i agree

Im afraid he was, they were both pretty non existant on saturday, and Id say against Saints Thorman looked a bigger threat with ball in hand, I dont know how you cant honestly see that.

thats YOUR opinion, and quite frankly if you think Thorman is better you are deluded

Fair enough.

if Washy was'nt injured id play him at loose man everytime, but in the meantime i think whiting would be a much better option than plodder radford.

Totally agree.

pity Agar the terrible doesnt, cos i expect the plodder to be named at 13 on friday,

Yup and like I said, I expect him to retire here aswell. Which is not good!

Were did I or anyone say Thorman is better? all im saying is how anyone can say he looked better then Thorman on saturday is beyond me, in what areas did Horne stand out?

please point out where i said that

when i was talking about him being nowhere near as bad as thorman, i wasnt talking about the wakey game i was talking in general.

Thats fair enough then, nobody in the right mind would say Thorman is a better player then Horne, the post you quoted was regarding saturday and the topic in general though.