Tansey and Cordoba's wages for a few weeks will be nowhere near 12months of Crockers salary, we also paid Byrne off.

i would be amazed if we kept him ,we need some real aggresion in the pack and go forward i just can not see him offering that i see our props been
cussack
dowes
omeley
hame
moa
radford

think they may pay Kingy off tbh thats more than enough

What's this point? Is that how much we're under the cap this season or how much we're paying out on players that are injured, or something else?

were half a million under cap

Crazy decision, especially if we lose another prop to injury over the next month.

guess after reading 3 pages nobody actualy knows why hes been sent out on loan then.

No we would rather send you out on loan

Sorry missed that publication of contract values.

WTF we are low on props, so we loan Cordoba in and loan Moloney out, whats the point in that!?

don't be daft I could name you 8 or 9 players that collectively earn 1.1m so unless the rest are playing for free you're way off the mark! We planned on spending full cap near enough, the only spare money we have left is crockers! And he certainly wouldn't be earning that!

So you keep saying, although oddly the figure is staying constant despite loan deals, signings, and transfer fees. There may also be some cash set aside to pay off contracts for the deadwood that everyone wants rid of.

This year's accounts will make interesting reading when they're released.

Is he the trouble causer and a bad influence on the rest of the squad?





Did he tell Agar that he is fecking clueless?

Did he try standing up for Hall so got the same treatment and got sent out on loan?

go on then but i'll tell you we are around half a million under cap

no but do tell?

I think you're wrong. But we'll not know for sure for another 12 months.

Well, no. Clearly. And there's no obvious reason that makes any sense. So if you have a suggestion that clears things up and makes the decision look less stupid it might be worth sharing.

i agree with that, but a club of our size shouldn't be underspending by that amount at the start of the season on the salary cap

Im not, we are massively under the cap

I thought we planned to be there or thereabouts on it. Crocker can't have been on much more than £170k and I can't imagine paying off Byrne will have saved much. Something doesn't add up here, unless it's just all the win bonus savings we've made.

I'm interested to know how and when you saw all the player's contracts. Genuinely interested. Also how you know how much Todd Byrne's severance agreement was. And how much we are paying Cordoba/Broughton etc. You'll understand that it is difficult to accept your claim when the information you claim to know would be confidential.

As for Maloney - surprising although it may have been something he was looking for. He may know he is to be released. Maybe Halifax are interested in 'trialling' him for next year ? I don't know. Put his heart into the games I've seen him play, which is more than some for sure, but not big enough for SL prop.

I'm sure you feel that your source is solid, but for me the figures don't add up. We know for a fact that we were up to (and indeed over) the cap in the recent past, and most of the big earners from then are either still here or have been replaced by players on similarly large contracts. Apart from Crocker, where has all the extra cash been saved?

Smart ar$e i don't need to see the contracts of every player to know we are way off the cap, quite suprising who and what you get to know, but hey you go along with the spin doctor im sure he could convince you otherwise

Me the smart ar$e ?


Fook me it aint me claiming to know this that and the other on here

If you haven't seen documentary evidence then you're just taking someone's word for it. That may be enough for you but I prefer hard evidence or at least something that tallies with the facts in the public domain.

I know were the info came from, so beleive me he should know