People don't know what has actually happened but are just guessing , I wouldn't have a problem with hall getting a new deal but he is not a full back

I'm looking like a lone voice here; Tansey is our best fullback. We need people who can produce a bit of magic if we have any hope of progressing in the play offs. Play him in the play offs and then get rid.

would he be 100% if he knew or thought he was been kicked out??

check ur in box on fb m8

i have and your wrong re hall

Whatever he has done must warrant this descision.
Tansey is one of our best attacking options . To leave him out is a big call. I think Morgan will be more pleased than Agar that he is missing.
He needs to sort himself out and grasp the chance of a RL career he has been given.

Wow! Ruthless. I'm impressed

Come on, spill!

Although I was OK with the release of Hall I would much rather have him playing fullback with his faults than have Tansey taking the mickey out of my club on multiple occasions. If Tansey has transgressed again we should consider getting rid. He's not good enough to be given too many chances.

[/u


I was told Hall signed for Rovers very soon after been told by FC that he could go?

Tansey knows him well from Sydney too

If a player has broken a club rule or not been honouring his contract then that player should be dealt with, if he continues then he goes end off. Trouble is at FC some players have to toe the line and others seem to be able to flout the rules.

Having a good code is a good thing in most business ventures, operating it seems to be difficult at sports clubs.

No he isn't a full back.

What he is, is a locally grown, creative centre, something we haven't seen for many a decade

Agreed 100%

Tansey should be on a final warning. If he were to go then we would need to find a fullback, Hall could be kept on I hear but it should not be as a fullback.

All this Horne to Fb is a joke surely, Whiting is the best option but we should be looking at a better option if Tansey were to leave.

Very happy. He's never been a fullback and clearly loves himself far more than the team. Also over the moon that our coach is showing some leadership qualities. Credit where credit is due Mr Agar, send him to Rovers and keep Craig!

Why SHOULD he be on a final warning? Do you know what Tanseys contract states in terms of what the disciplinary procedure is?
How do you know what is exactly on his personnel record?

Pure guesswork on your part.

If Tansey has missed training its a sure sign he is losing interest. As for Hall, he has turned in as many good performances as bad, so inconsistency is his problem. Mind you inconsistency could be said of Tansey during most games.

Got to say I am impressed with Agars attitude in this area, Agar looks so placid

...talk about never judging a book by it's cover

The decision was made easier by that fact he's been suspended and not in the team, it would have been a much more difficult decision to drop him had he been playing as it would have magnified it alot more. At the minute it will just look like Hall has done enough to retain his place and he can play it off as that

Your right Agar wouldn't have dropped him if he'd have been playing.

If he'd of had these off the field problems whilst in the side the decision would of been harder than it is now because it would have been magnified alot more.

Here the media just thinks he can't get back in the team because Craig Hall has been good

Last time it happened Tansey was playing and was dropped it was then released to the public via the clubs website.

If the same has happened I'd expect us to handle it in similar circumstances.

The last time he dropped him he was playing

Its not the first time Tansey has been dropped for disciplinary you know!

Next time we will ask him to only do it when he is playing eh just so Agar can meet with your approval?

Daft thing is he probably skipped training because he knew he wasnt playing for a few weeks anyway!!!