I know, can't wait to watch 2 of the top 3 sides battle it out. I would hate to be in a mid table battle

I'd hate to be in a Vectra but there you go.

Will Yeamo appeal, or will we accept this as Wigan's token recompense?

I like vectrabeast, Make's me realise that I wasn't just being a sore loser leaving Wigan last year, Admittedly it was a minority and only like the idiots that we seem to have ourselves inherited.

Justice done, in some form or another, on the Tomkins bans - Now, next time they're up at RedHall they can't use the old "no previous" chestnut.

You mean like the one Radford used tonight and got away with despite assaulting Ryan Bailey last season (not that I didn't love that one)!

I for one wouldn't. Both talented of course, but no class.

How many games did Radford get for that?

Manu/Tickle > J.Tomkins

His previous is for something completely different so i guess that is why the "no previous" excuse was taken.

Waste of time talking to most Wigan fans about this.

I have never seen a bigger set of moaning fans (in victory aswell) and biased as the ones on RLfans.

They seem to think we played with bad tactics despite them doing this for a number of years, Westerman try (looks a no try) shouldn't have been given, but choosing to ignore the 2 forward passes for their trys.

Also they have tried to blame Ganson for Joel sending off, he has only himself to blame for the way he reacted, no excuses for that type of play.

The Sam Tompkins is a victim thing is just laughable, I hope one day he leaves Wigan and they can see the type of player he is.

I hope every team go out and play against wigan the same way we did. They'll soon change tactics if they're regularly copping bans

Two years and he'll be tossing it off at Bath mate

They're easier to wind up than the dobbins







[url=http://viewtopic.php?f=28&t=486628HERE[/url

BITE BITE BITE

Put the glue down son, its not good for you!!

Prove the 2 passes were forward!

Ganson was to blame, both Joel and Yeaman should have seen yellow for the fight that yeaman started.

We know what type of player he is, He is the best half/full back in the league that gets us a bag full of points from tries or penalties by getting under the opposition players noses and convincing the ref he is a victim! (doing his job

)

why has this idiot been allowed to keep posting?

(other FC fans have copped bans for less abusive language)

Well they did a good job of getting through your defence.... Whereas Wigan were better when Tomkins went off!!

And for the record, I would have neither of them in my team!!

And theres the proof of what a deluded set of fans you are with no knowledge of the game!!

We just like a good laugh now and then

well, the use of the word "mongoloid" is comparable to "retard" and we all know how that word is regarded, just seems a bit of a double standard Chris.

Absolutely......

Joel is nothing, I wouldn't want him. Simple as that!!

Sam is a very good talent, but a cheat. He plays the official and its not good to watch. We fans prefer rugby league as its a good honest hard game. It will go down the 'non-contact' route of football if we let little whinging wimps like Sam Tomkins get away with what he does!

Tom Briscoe has ability, but doesn't think he's the best in the world and use cheating tactics like Samantha does. He lets his rugby do the talking.

Sam is the best player in the English game yet you'd rather have Phelps or Whiting at 1 or Richard Horne at 6?

Your obv forgetting the 46-0 drubbing at your place last season where your lot spent 80 minutes chasing his shadow, no wonder you hate him.

A pint of what your on please mate

I didn't say what we had was better did I now??
Though those three players are far more honest and have alot more integrity and respect for the game than Samantha T.

He may be the most talented player in the game, I don't doubt that but my point was, I'd rather have players like Tom Briscoe who have exceptional talent but aren't hated by anyone for rule bending!!

Even Rovers fans love Briscoe FFS.