why don`t we hit him the pocket and refuse to buy any drinks, food etc from the stadium.






COME ON THE BLADES

for tomorrow night.

I will be able to read his fixture list next year. It will be under the heading Championship League.

He is an arrogant foolish fool

On Sports Talk last night Burnsy said that he is trying to get an interview with someone from Red Hall. Maybe we can get the other side of the story from Woods?

My knee jerk was that I hope City go down, because of this decision, but in reality I don't want that to happen!

All very interesting stuff and mostly correct in my book. HOWEVER you ARE totally and utterly wrong when you say it would have been built if only City played there! Having been part of the team that drew up the tenancy agreement for the Stadium and made the presentations to the Government when the local authority was asking the gov for permission to spend the £43m on the Stadium (As you have to do with Capital expenditure fro LA reserves), I can assure you the building of the KC was dependant on having 'At least 2 of the local proffessional teams as tenants'. Under law an authority cannot build a stadium for one club it is not legal or ethical.

Look at the Council minutes if you want confirmation of this in fact the then Leader of the Council Pat Doyle had to assure the full council that it would be used by at least 2 clubs (Rovers turned the chance down) before the project was voted on!

Without both hull Fc and Hull City signing up to play there it would not have been built!

For me as I have said on many occassions before all I want to know is how can Wigan give a concrete promise that a game can be played and City cannot! Thats the only Question for me! Football first me thinks!

OWNED!

And also further proof that there is no way FC could be kicked out as it would be in breach of this agreement for investment!

Wilf has already owned you all ways up on this one. I just thought I'd have a little gloat as well.



The fact is that 2 clubs had to be involved or there would have been no stadium. City would not have got the KC on their own, it simply would not have been built.

For someone who claims to be both an RL and soccer fan it's rather clear to see where your loyalties actually lie. I'm beginning to think that you're just another poorly-disguised Tiggers troll...

Duffen is a 'here today gone tomorrow' speculator so I can't be bothered with what he says and for what its worth I will be there at City v Blackburn on Sunday. What has always perturbed me is the conflict of interests of first Pearson and now Duffen have with the football club and the SMC, and the perceived lack of involvement by the Hull board, because at the end of the day we are both tenants in a community stadium.

The council should step in and warn Duffen, he has done alot of damage to the community and lost alot of money by his decision, also I can see the RFL looking elseware in the future for internationals before considering the KC.

Totally irrelevant in my book.............hence the reason i couldn't give 2 hoots



Not making it a Hull City v Hull FC argument.

Just Duffen's role as Chairman of SMC shouldn't allow him to show favouritism to either team.

I've been told the Rugby League wanted to play when Hull Fair was on and thts why we didn't get a game at the KC Stadium, so not all the blame is Duffins.

You've been told wrong then. The Four Nations doesn't start until the last week in October.

Who is this??????????? Duffen has a point!!

The most amazing fact to come out of all this is the fact that so many people in Hull actually give a flying one about international RL!

Still, silly me for not remembering nearly being trampled to death in the stampede to get into the England v Samoa game t'other year.

Not to mention the fact that everyone has seemingly forgotten about the World Cup debacle.

Why would a so called City fan use a rugby forum?


My guessing is that you are a rlfans user, who is obviously using another account to wind people up. Every time something regarding City or the stadium, one of you always pop up around the same time!

Who made you the man in charge?

I am very much a rugby league fan (alright, Bradford!), but am very much first and foremost a City fan, and i simply feel the need to have my say on what i feel is a total no-brainer.

Is that alright by you?

Not it's not alright, please leave!

Only joking.

It's just seems as though a Citeh fan comes about just when ever is said about there beloved club.

Not much different to you lot turning up on Rovers' board when they talk about you, and vice-versa!

Please explain why you feel this ?

And btw there wasn't much of a stampede at the last England U21 football match at the KC.

Fantastic, well done you. So you still posted that the Stadium only happened due to Duffen

Rugby fans bantering on a rugby forum!



HTH.

Did I say that ? Where?

I am only going on what I was told by these councillors , but I will not say you are wrong, if it is the case that you have seen coucil minutes to the contrary.

Not a Tigger or Tiger's troll and I am loyal to both clubs . As i have said in an earlier post I have been going to FC regularly since 1975 , can remember the dugouts on the 3d stand side about that time , the embarrassment against Bramley when we had no clean shirts to change into at HT so the game was abandoned . There have been times when City have been at home and I have been to watch FC , Wigan in the CH cup in 2000 when city played Rochdale is one. Me and my wife went to Perpignan so watch FC in july '07 ( a long way and alot of money for a troll ) . So please dont accuse me of something I am not .

Does not mean it will be the same in 2009 .