Completely agree. As if Ellis would take been rested for this one anyway, no chance

He has got to play.

You didn't have a couple of tries chalked off if there chalked off they never were tries as for the rest of your ifs and buts we outplayed you for 60 minutes and you started to throw the ball about and you got on a roll that we couldn't stop it

You must be due a derby win. Been over a year, right?

We might be due one but I don't see it happening this time

We've all seen winning tries that were not tries but allowed by Ganson, tit for tat, in Magic games. Your logic is flawed.

No yours is the tries weren't allowed therefore not tries it's not hard to follow

Your right, we was gash for 60 mins. Final result that counts though and we havnt looked back since

We were pretty gash for 80 minutes against rovers but they were gasher than gash for the full 80 so we won

If we're at any point losing during the game, can people wait until the final whistle this time before starting Radford out threads & what not? ta

Haha I was quite proud of myself that day, thats exactly what I did do

Without getting into a slagging match Frankie my point was that you wasn't all over us for 60 minutes and it wasn't as one sided as the score suggested .
My memory is not what it was but I'm sure we had 2 trys chalked off by the video ref

.... which shows, at the very least, that we were creating chances.

rovers will be up for their cup final, hopefully we can kill them off in the first half

I hope campese is back and we send taylor, watts, bowden and frank at him all game

Read the post again, it's called reverse logic, you's is even more flawed now

That's the spirit!

Hoping we play our strongest 17. We need to be ruthless next week and Derbies are never easy to win.

We are now in a serious foot race for the Top Four and just need to keep our current momentum going.

Yes but its hard to raise your game against a championship standard team, as Rovers know.

if its rovers cup final does that mean we win 50-0

haha, yeah never thought of it like that

It is only a try if the ref says it is anything else is irrelevant hence why I accept Chris Green scored the winning try at magic

So, the ref gives "no try" on the field but refers to the VR, who overturns the onfield decision and gives a try, but, according to you, that's still no try?

You'll be telling us Compo Campese is fully fit next...

Right I'll say it again if the try is awarded its a try regardless of who makes the decision is that clear enough.If you get a try disallowed in the last minute to win the cup they don't give you the cup because the replay shows it should have stood

You won the cup on the back of a try that wasn't a try. If video refs had been invented Lloyd wouldn't have been ruled as obstructing. "If ifs and ands were pots and pans"

Which match and incident was this from?