On the bright side.. I thought we would get beat by 40 plus. Still not good enough though.

Need to get on the board!!

Another nilling?

And another disappointment.

Was hoping we'd get a bit more shat on score line wise to make Pearson more likely to shake things up a bit.

Been terrible this half.

You don't think 20-0 is bad enough?

I think if it wasn't for the bad weather we would have.

What one of the journo's makes of us

Chris Irvine ‏@Chrisirvine 1m
Leeds haven't been good and have won this game easily. Hull have been, frankly, awful. Tough times at the KC ... 20-0 with 4 to go #SLLeeHul

Shaul scores try!!!

Thank goodness for small mercies.

Miller and Rankin get another chance in the halves. No threat but they need to be given time .................

At least you scored, something to build on?

Seems like there are positives to take in defence, with Leeds getting 3 fortunate try's. But the writing was on the wall when we didn't take our earlier chances. Good to see us trying right to the end though.

We are not exactly blessed with good backs at the minute, but Radford is hardly making the best of the situation with team selections like this. Seems like Lancaster has done nothing wrong tonight, so leave him in until Lineham is back. Get Talanoa back on the wing and put Sa and Crooks at centre. I just don't understand the logic in the selection tonight.

Monkeys and shakespeare spring to mind

We've lacked some luck again but were beaten by a better team in poor conditions (for both sides). No one expected anything else and most would have expected worse. Need to keep building but we have no threat in key positions - has to be addressed.

Carn't help thinking that a better team would of beat Leeds tonight they coughed up enough possession for a decent team to take advantage, I don't take any positives out of tonight because we got lucky Leeds had a off day and the weather was abit of a leveller.

I never know if the weather ever really is a leveller for us. We are a terrible wet weather team. We will never know if Leeds would have ran away if it was a dry track, but I like to think we would have used the ball a bit better.

We handed them 2 try's and they had a massive stroke of luck hitting the post , honestly thought the score flattered them . The difference for me was yet again lack of a kicking game !!

Few positives for me were Shaul very good under the high ball in bad weather , the forwards fronted up against theirs and a well done to Callum Lancaster

McGuire aims for the post it's an actual tactic, Leeds weren't at their best tonight and neither were hull but Leeds could've won by more with the amount of possession they had

So the great plan was to kick the ball dead and keep it out of play for as long as possible. Great entertainment abounds then. Also, the weather affected the ball control, Leeds seemed to be OK when it mattered.

I wish Doc would stop being a cheerleader for the current regime. Why doesn't anyone ask him what he thinks needs to be done. It's getting boring now.

Why's everyone going on about the 'appalling weather'? The pitch was wet following the storm before the game, but there was no rain at all during the match. In fact, it was quite bright with clear skies.

Ball would've been a bit slippery but the conditions were far from terrible.

He was the same under Agar. And you are right it is boring.

Really?

Here's a clue. Super League standings;

Leeds 1st

Hull FC 10th

You're not still thinking....surely not....that maybe if you look at yourself at the right angle...in a certain light.....hey!!!!