Correct, it was a silly thing to do and was puzzled by the amount of FC fans disgruntled by the decision.

When the ref is allowing all manner of laying on (for both teams) you can't blame anyone when it kicks off.
How many times was there a stand off with the marker once the ball had been played? Simply because Roby failed to control the ptb. Game was painfully slow because of this too.

Countless.

Exactly, because the players were sick of the constant laying on.

I think the reason people were annoyed was because a Wakefield player kicked out in a tackle only a minute earlier and nothing was done about it. The ref completely lost control of the game.

up here in my local boozer,the guys know i travel down to hull for the home games,and ask me how i think things will go.my pal john has got so interested he listens on the radio for the results.last saturday,he said `i reckon you will get a descent win tomorrow against wakefield"i said don`t be so sure , because these are the games were we usualy make a rollocks of it,and low and behold,we did it again.

Totally different.

Crookes had the ball and Riley still had hold of his legs (up in the air). Crookes wanted to get on and play the ball.

Stupid if he did kick out yes and only he will know how much he meant it.

All came a few tackles after Tuson had a dust up with a Wakey player on West stand side which Roby just totally ignored even though it went on for a fair while.

And that was just after Sammut ? kicked out when tackled on the east side which was similarly ignored.

I .don't know who it was, a wakefield player pulled crooks leg 45 degrees back so he'd be facing his own line, it looked a bit dangerous to me

Crookes had a fairly decent game for me.

Miller, however...