Losing Bowden would be a blow and you'd have to wonder about our judgement and/or the desire/ability to back up words with money. Recruitment and retention has been our biggest problem for years and this to me would signal nothings changed. Hope it's wrong.

I would also prioritise Bowden. But we currently have Paea, Watts, Feka, Green and Carvell contracted with BTW coming through. 7 props in a squad where we also have depth in the back row through Ellis, Westerman, Tuson, Thompson, Whiting and Hadley could be seen as heavy when there are more pressing areas to strengthen? I don't think it's about money because we already have a big squad, more how best to spend the cap.

But with Carvell, Feka and maybe Paea only staying for one more year, Bowden is a must for the future, I'd rather keep him and not keep Carvell.

I'd be surprised if Bowden left, but not sure why we haven't sorted out an extension yet.

Wouldn't disagree with that. Bowden's come on really well this year, must be ahead of Green now.

At the moment I'd say yes, but that's down to Greens injury.

These two should play a pivotal part in the Hull pack for the next few years.

I will be massively disappointed if we kept Bowden go and it will go against everything Pearson and Radford have stated.

I still reckon Bowdens agent is using Hudds interest to get a better deal at Hull and he will sign an extension in the next few weeks.

I'd like to see us go down the route of Leeds and Wigan and players like him to sign 4/5 year deals

green and bowden both have bags of potential. if we were leeds or wigan they would both be signed to long term deals by now

This is so true

Green signed for 5 years last year didn't he??

Really like Green he's fast, gives 100% each game and is very aggressive. But because he's a tall mobile prop abit like Watts I'd like to see him develop an offloading game and be our own Peacock. Same build and game style imo.

Looking forward to having Greene back. I've enjoyed seeing Thomo show up well but he is more of a back row.

It's a bit early to start calling them the Panzer (ii) Pack but our young, strong and fast forwards could become our best attacking strength.