I just want to be entertained, we all spend a lot to follow FC home and away. After all, the club only exists due to the money we put in.
As Kosh put it though, we should be able to have both. We only need a coach. Financial stability IMO is the hardest thing to achieve, but once that's in place, there should be no excuse on the field. We should be successful.
Rovers are a shining light in what they have achieved in Superleague. THey have a fan as a chairman, a good coach who seems to know the game. Not world beaters but improving. My only doubt as a rovers fan would be what might happen to the club in the long term, as financially, they are not that sound. However, short term, I would be loving it, and loving watching FC play dire one man rugby.

People need to understand this isn't a money issue, it's a control issue. The club would spend on a coach but wouldn't accept one who wanted to run things his own way. Was the main reason that mcrae left. they want a YES man and have one. A decent coach wouldn't work under those circumstances. macnamara will be our coach after agar as he fits the requirement

I've been a little unfair I guess your question is would we prefer a board that looks after the penny's and builds a sound future for our great club or a board with more money than sense who can throw cash at the problem?

The board have done a great job securing the future of the club, building from a solid fan base and income streams. However, now we need a set up to put transfer this hard work into on-field success spending money where it is needed starting with a world class (not on the cap) coach. I think the board are being too loyal and need to put Hull FC first.