On Companies House website it shows Celtic Crusaders Limited status (which I'm assuming is the entity that is the current Crusaders) as "Active - Proposal to Strike Off". Not sure whether this means because the fact they've failed to file both accounts and annual returns in line with deadlines means they're in administrative trouble with Companies House or what, but when added to the other rumours of financial difficulties it can't be good news. Maybe we could help them with a transfer fee. Sammut is a genius (with a great hair and tache combo also).

Me too.

Nailed on for Rovers isnt he?

Joking aside i dont think he'd touch us again, due to the way our administration treated him.

He's not the only one who got $h!t on by the owners

Brough for me has always been a class act and it was one of the most stupid decisions Peter Sharp ever made in getting rid of him. Imagine this team with Brough playing regularly - We'd be top three no problem and would of beaten Rovers in the play offs. Those who say he isnt any good havent got a clue

completely agree, he looks top class one week, goes missing for the next few weeks.

would walk into the current Hull side due to our lack of halves, but long-term we need a more consistent option.

as others have suggested, would a transfer fee tempt Crusaders to sell Sammut? been impressed with him so far and he's only 23.

You really are bitter and twisted, aren't you?

I like Sammut, but he's another 'rocks and diamonds' player who would get crucified on here as soon as he made a mistake.

You really offer nothing to this forum other than to argue with everyone whilst never offering anything constructive. How the hell you made mod is beyond me.

and that is as they say bang on the money, he was VERY average but had a great boot and a very bad attitude...
to be fair his performances can range from spectacular to non existent even now!!

my lord , you must be the only person who does not know the hassle he caused almost daily when at FC, everyone else AND i MEAN EVERYONE at the club was glad to see the back of him, oh and his performances are at best irratic

jesuuuuuus christ , talk about pot and kettle !!!

It was Broughs own doing and his attitude that caused Sharp to get rid.......He really ripped it up at Cas and Wakey didnt he....also hasnt he been dropped at Hudds because of his attitude.

Lets see how good he is on friday then eh?

Not often i agree with you but you are spot on there old son!!!

Im a realist unlike yourself who is simply full of 54it

now that is funny


tell me apart from Sky TV what is your experience of Pro footie???

Ive not played but then neither have you. Oh sorry your called EXPRO so you must have. Oh and sorry again for not being fooled by the pro FC rubiish you constantly spout with no foundation. Remember you said we would get to the grand final numb nuts, not me!

We're talking about Hull Fc in 2010 - not in 2005/6. People mature. Look at Briers.

Brough would bring so much to us it isn't true. We'll just keep plodding alomng with the likes of Washbrook in the halves shall we? Remember the good game Brough had at Wire in the play off match and then if i remember correctly was dropped entirely for the Bulls game where we got walloped to make room for some hot headed overseas loon. No wonder Broughs attitude was bad at times.

Hell - another Irony Meter destroyed.



Most things are beyond you, Seb - don't sweat it.

They're not celtic crusaders any more are they?

Every player in the world is rocks and diamonds. You can't be diamonds all the time. sammutt is just the type of plaer Hull fans would take to. He plays very much like long IMO

Its Old Bean, not Old Son

NOT where i come from mate

The pie shop?

Spot on!!!!!